An industrial chemical plant at dusk, with lit pipework and stacks glowing orange against a deep blue sky.

For chemical and petrochemical CISOs, OT and process control engineers, process safety leads, supply chain directors and the boards of speciality and agrochemical producers

Quantum risk in chemicals

The recipe is the company. The safety system is the licence to operate.

In fifteen minutes you will know which of your formulations, process recipes, safety system configurations and site records are already exposed, what NIS2, Seveso III, COMAH and the Cyber Resilience Act let a competent authority or a customer ask about cryptography, and the first 90 days of a plan that fits a turnaround calendar.

  • Your exposure, site by site and product by product
  • The evidence a NIS2 auditor, a Seveso or COMAH inspector and a key customer can ask for
  • A 90-day plan that respects the turnaround schedule and the safety case
  • The right training for each role
1,500+
professional members
900+
organisations represented
40+
countries
Vendor-neutral
based on evidence, not hype

Proud to recommend our expert members

Qrypto Cyber
Eclypses
Arqit
QuantBond
Krown
Applied Quantum
Quantum Bitcoin
Venari Security
QuStream
BHO Legal
Census
QSP
IONQ - ID Quantique
Patero
Entopya
Belden
Atlant3D
Zenith Studio
Qudef
Aries Partners
GQI
Upperside Conferences
Austrade
Arrise Innovations
CyberRST
Triarii Research
QSysteme
WizzWang
DeepTech DAO
Xyberteq
Viavi
Entrust
Qsentinel
Nokia
Gopher Security
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
Qrypto Cyber
Eclypses
Arqit
QuantBond
Krown
Applied Quantum
Quantum Bitcoin
Venari Security
QuStream
BHO Legal
Census
QSP
IONQ - ID Quantique
Patero
Entopya
Belden
Atlant3D
Zenith Studio
Qudef
Aries Partners
GQI
Upperside Conferences
Austrade
Arrise Innovations
CyberRST
Triarii Research
QSysteme
WizzWang
DeepTech DAO
Xyberteq
Viavi
Entrust
Qsentinel
Nokia
Gopher Security
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
A laboratory bench with flasks of blue, orange and green liquid, and a researcher in blue protective clothing working behind them.
Commissioned at the last turnaround. Running until the one after next.

Step 1 of 5

Know which recipes, safety systems and site records are already exposed

A chemical plant does not change its cryptography between turnarounds. The distributed control system commissioned in 2026 will still be running the unit in 2046, authenticating engineering workstations and OPC UA servers with certificates built on RSA or ECDSA. The same algorithms protect the recipe that makes your margin, the safety instrumented system configuration that keeps the unit inside its safe envelope, and the remote tunnel your automation vendor uses at three in the morning. A cryptographically relevant quantum computer breaks all of them. Nobody needs one yet: traffic recorded now is read later, and a formulation stays valuable for as long as the product sells.

Chemical sector records and configurations that must stay confidential or trustworthy beyond the post-quantum deadlines
Record or configurationHow long it stays sensitiveConfidential until, if created in 2026
Formulations, process recipes, catalyst and reaction conditions (trade secrets)Life of the product and its derivatives, 15 to 30 years; a trade secret has no expiry2041 to 2056, or indefinitely
Safety instrumented system logic, safety requirement specifications and trip settings (IEC 61511)Life of the safety system, typically 15 to 20 years between replacements2041 to 2046
DCS configuration, historian data and batch recordsLife of the unit; batch records kept for product traceability and liability2036 to 2046
Hazardous substance inventories, site plans and Seveso or COMAH safety reportsSecurity-sensitive for the life of the establishment and kept current for the competent authorityLife of the site, 2050s
Supplier, toll-manufacturing and customer contracts, pricing and volumesContract term plus renegotiation cycles, 5 to 10 years2031 to 2036
Regulatory submissions and product registration dossiersThe product's time on the market, often 20 years or more2046+

Lifetimes are typical for the asset class; check them against your product portfolio, your safety case review cycle and the record-keeping rules of each market you sell into. For the method, see what to protect first when data outlives the algorithm.

Where your exposure sits, and what you will know

An aerial view of large white storage tanks beside railway sidings with lines of wagons.

The process: DCS, SIS, PLCs and historians

OPC UA secures the control network with X.509 certificates on RSA-2048 or ECDSA P-256. Modbus/TCP and PROFINET carry no cryptography at all, so the protection sits in the TLS and VPN tunnels around them. The safety instrumented system is segregated by design under IEC 61511, and its logic solver changes only with a documented modification and a proof test, which in practice means a turnaround.

You will know which control and safety networks carry a quantum-vulnerable handshake, which historians, batch servers and engineering workstations can take hybrid TLS now, and which controllers wait for a planned shutdown or a replacement.

A technician in a hard hat and ear defenders pressing a touchscreen on an industrial control cabinet.

The site: remote access, engineering workstations and physical security

Automation vendors, licensors and system integrators reach the plant through remote tunnels keyed with RSA or ECDH. Access control, CCTV and the perimeter systems that CFATS and COMAH security expectations rest on now ride the same IP network and the same certificate authority. A recorded session today is a readable session later.

You will know which remote-access paths to migrate first, which engineering workstation and jump-server certificates to replace, and how to keep the physical security integration on a separate trust chain.

A pressure gauge mounted on stainless steel pipework in a clean process area.

The supply chain and product: suppliers, logistics, batch certificates and regulatory exchange

Toll manufacturers hold your recipe. Raw material suppliers exchange orders over EDI and AS2. Carriers and terminals receive hazardous goods documentation, and customers trust a signed certificate of analysis for every batch. One partner with no post-quantum plan, or one forged signature on a batch certificate, puts the product and the site at risk together.

You will know which partners hold recipes and keys on your behalf, which data exchanges to migrate first, and what to write into the next toll-manufacturing agreement and the next supplier code of conduct.

Free readiness check

Score your sites and your supply chain in two minutes

Eight questions mapped to what a NIS2 auditor, a Seveso or COMAH inspector, a key customer and your board can ask about cryptography. You get a score, your top three priorities and the next step that closes your biggest gap. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Start the check
1Do you have a cryptographic inventory that covers the control network, the safety system, the site systems and the enterprise systems that connect them?

NIS2 lists the use of cryptography among the ten measures every entity in scope must address, and the chemicals sector is in scope. You cannot document keys you have not listed, and the safety system is usually the gap.

2Do you know which controllers, logic solvers and edge gateways can accept new cryptography by firmware update, and which cannot?

ML-KEM and ML-DSA keys and signatures are far larger than their RSA and ECC equivalents. Flash, RAM and cycle-time budgets decide whether migration is a software release, a retrofit at the next turnaround or a replacement.

3Have you mapped which formulations, recipes and records must stay confidential beyond 2030 against the algorithms protecting them today?

A recipe recorded in transit now can be read once a cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists. A 20-year product life is well inside that window, and a trade secret has no expiry date.

4Is your safety instrumented system on a separate trust chain from the basic process control system, with a documented path to change its cryptography?

IEC 61511 asks for independence between the SIS and the control layer. If both trust the same certificate authority on the same algorithm, a compromise of one is a compromise of both, and the SIS only changes under modification control.

5Have your automation vendors, licensors, toll manufacturers and logistics partners given you a dated post-quantum roadmap?

DCS firmware, OPC UA stacks, safety controllers and remote-support tools are bought in. Their timeline is your timeline, and most have not been asked.

6Is there a named owner and a budget line for post-quantum migration that spans OT, process safety, IT and procurement?

In a chemical company the work falls between site engineering, process safety, IT and purchasing. Without an owner it belongs to nobody and misses the next turnaround and the next capital cycle.

7Has your board or management body been briefed on quantum risk in the last 12 months?

NIS2 Article 20 makes management bodies approve and oversee cyber security measures and follow training. Chemicals is an Annex II sector, and a Seveso upper-tier site adds a safety case the board already owns.

8Does every new control system specification, licence agreement and toll-manufacturing contract require crypto-agility and a post-quantum roadmap from the other party?

A DCS bought in 2026 will still be on the unit in 2046. Each algorithm-fixed system you accept now is a replacement you will pay for twice, and each partner holding your recipe without a plan is an exposure you cannot close alone.

Step 2 of 5

Know what NIS2, Seveso III, COMAH, the Cyber Resilience Act and your customers will expect, and when

  1. 2024

    Standards and rules

    NIST publishes FIPS 203, 204 and 205 in August. Member States had to transpose NIS2, which lists chemicals among its other critical sectors, by 17 October. The Cyber Resilience Act enters into force on 10 December.

  2. 2026

    CRA reporting and EU first steps

    Manufacturers of products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under the CRA from 11 September. The EU roadmap asks every Member State to have a national PQC roadmap and first transition steps in place by the end of the year. NIST IR 8547 is final on 27 October.

  3. 2027

    CRA in full

    From 11 December, hardware and software products with digital elements placed on the EU market must meet the CRA's essential requirements. For a chemical company that reaches the sensors, analysers and dosing equipment you buy and any connected product you sell.

  4. 2028

    UK discovery done

    The NCSC expects defined migration goals, a full discovery exercise and an initial plan, including long-lived hardware roots of trust and the ICS devices it singles out as hard to upgrade.

  5. 2030

    High-risk migrated

    EU target for high-risk use cases, including critical infrastructure. NIST deprecates 112-bit RSA and ECC. A unit commissioned at a 2026 turnaround is four years into a twenty-year life.

  6. 2035

    RSA and ECC disallowed

    NIST disallows them. The EU roadmap and the NCSC timeline end here. The safety system installed in 2026 is still a decade from its planned replacement.

Key facts for the chemicals sector, checked 30 October 2026

  • The Commission Recommendation of 11 April 2024 (C(2024) 2393) asks every Member State to adopt a national post-quantum strategy and to deploy post-quantum cryptography, hybrid where needed, across public administration systems and critical infrastructure. European Commission
  • The EU Coordinated Implementation Roadmap, published through the NIS Cooperation Group on 23 June 2025, asks Member States to start the transition and have national roadmaps in place by the end of 2026, to migrate high-risk use cases by the end of 2030 and as many systems as feasible by the end of 2035. European Commission
  • Securing Tomorrow, Today, the joint statement of cyber security agencies from EU Member States first issued in November 2024 and re-issued with further signatories in July 2025, treats the quantum threat as part of cyber security risk management now and calls for hybrid post-quantum deployment. BSI
  • NIS2 lists chemicals among its other critical sectors and energy, including oil, gas and hydrogen, among its sectors of high criticality, so a petrochemical site with a refinery, a gas terminal or a hydrogen plant can sit in both. Every entity in scope must address ten measures including supply chain security and the use of cryptography and, where appropriate, encryption. Member States had until 17 October 2024 to transpose it. European Commission
  • The Seveso III Directive (2012/18/EU), in force since 13 August 2012, applies to over 11,000 industrial installations across the EU in the chemical and petrochemical industry and the fuel wholesale and storage sectors, with stricter legal requirements for installations handling higher amounts of dangerous substances. The Commission's second implementation report, published in 2025, found fewer than 22 major industrial accidents a year on average between 2019 and 2022. European Commission
  • The Cyber Resilience Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, entered into force on 10 December 2024. Reporting obligations for actively exploited vulnerabilities apply from 11 September 2026 and the main obligations, including the essential cybersecurity requirements for hardware and software products with digital elements, from 11 December 2027. European Commission
  • IEC 61511-1:2016, with its 2017 amendment, gives requirements for the specification, design, installation, operation and maintenance of a safety instrumented system in the process industry sector, as the process-sector implementation of IEC 61508. It governs how and when the logic solver that keeps a unit inside its safe envelope can be changed. IEC
  • IEC 62443-3-3:2013 sets system security requirements and security levels for industrial automation and control systems, used with zones and conduits, and IEC 62443-4-2:2019 sets the technical security requirements for the components inside them. Neither names post-quantum algorithms yet. IEC
  • The UK NCSC timeline of 20 March 2025 asks organisations to complete discovery and an initial plan by 2028, including any long-lived hardware roots of trust, to finish the highest-priority migrations by 2031 and to complete migration by 2035. It says discovery should cover ICS devices, that some legacy ICS protocols were never brought up to modern cryptographic standards, and that physical infrastructure changes should coincide with other maintenance. UK NCSC
  • The COMAH Regulations 2015 came into force on 1 June 2015. An establishment is upper tier or lower tier according to whether the quantity of dangerous substances present reaches the column 3 or the column 2 threshold in Schedule 1. The Competent Authority is HSE, or ONR for nuclear sites, acting jointly with the Environment Agency in England, Natural Resources Wales and SEPA in Scotland. HSE
  • HSE operational guidance OG86, Cyber Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems, published in March 2017, is written for HSE inspectors and made freely available to COMAH operators. It was tested through trial inspections between November 2017 and May 2018 and draws on BS EN 61511 among its standards. HSE
  • Schedule 2 of the UK NIS Regulations 2018 lists ten essential service subsectors, among them oil and gas. Chemicals does not appear, so a chemical manufacturer falls under the Regulations only where it also operates an oil or gas service in scope. legislation.gov.uk
  • As of 28 July 2023, Congress allowed the statutory authority for the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) to lapse. CISA cannot require facilities to report their chemicals of interest or submit information in CSAT, cannot inspect and cannot enforce the regulations, which affected the 3,200 facilities previously designated as high-risk. CISA encourages facilities to maintain security measures through the voluntary ChemLock programme. CISA
  • CISA's Chemical Security Assessment Tool was the target of an intrusion from 23 to 26 January 2024 through a webshell on an Ivanti device, with potential unauthorised access to Top-Screen surveys, security vulnerability assessments, site security plans and personnel surety submissions. CISA found no evidence of exfiltration and said all information in CSAT was encrypted with AES-256. CISA
  • CISA's Chemical Sector covers basic chemicals, speciality chemicals, agricultural chemicals and consumer products, converting raw materials into more than 70,000 products for more than 750,000 end users, across several hundred thousand US facilities that make, store, use or transport chemicals. CISA
  • NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3, Guide to Operational Technology Security, published in September 2023, covers industrial control systems and recommends countermeasures that account for the performance, reliability and safety requirements of OT. An initial public draft of Revision 4 is open for comment until 30 November 2026. NIST
  • The final NIST IR 8547, published 27 October 2026, deprecates quantum-vulnerable public-key cryptography after 2030 and disallows it after 2035. NIST
A train of dark tank wagons standing on tracks beneath overhead lines.

The evidence you will be able to show

NIS2 Article 21

A cryptography policy backed by an inventory

You show: A documented policy on the use of cryptography and encryption, and the inventory behind it, covering control, safety, site and enterprise systems, with quantum-vulnerable algorithms flagged.

Seveso III, COMAH and OG86

A safety case that names the cryptographic dependency

You show: The safety management system and the IACS cyber security assessment identify where the SIS, the BPCS and remote access share a trust chain, and the modification plan that separates them and changes the algorithm.

IEC 62443 and IEC 61511

Zones and conduits with a migration sequence

You show: A zone and conduit model of each site with the cryptographic dependencies of every conduit, the devices that are algorithm-fixed and the turnarounds that will be used to change them.

EU roadmap and NCSC timeline

A named lead and dated milestones

You show: A PQC migration lead, a plan with the EU end-2026 and 2030 milestones and the NCSC 2028 and 2031 milestones, and roadmaps on file from each automation vendor, licensor and toll manufacturer.

A laboratory bench with flasks of blue, orange and green liquid, and a researcher in blue protective clothing working behind them.

UK operators. COMAH 2015 has applied since 1 June 2015, and HSE's OG86 is the lens an inspector uses on your control and safety systems. Chemicals is not a Schedule 2 sector under the NIS Regulations 2018, so unless you also run an oil or gas service in scope, the pressure comes from the COMAH safety case, your insurers and your customers rather than a NIS competent authority. The NCSC timeline sets the pace: discovery and a plan by 2028, highest-priority migration by 2031, complete by 2035, with ICS devices named as the hard part. Read the NCSC position explained.

Petrochemicals, refineries and terminals

A petrochemical complex that includes a refinery, a gas terminal or a hydrogen plant is an Annex I energy entity under NIS2 as well as an Annex II chemicals entity, and in the UK the oil and gas subsectors of the NIS Regulations 2018 apply to the energy side. Pipeline and terminal SCADA runs the same Modbus and IEC 104 stacks as the utilities, often over long serial and radio links where key sizes matter more. See the energy and utilities page.

Speciality and agrochemical producers

Smaller plants, more products, more recipes and more toll manufacturers. The exposure here is less the control network and more the recipe management system, the PLM and the partner who runs your process under licence. Trade secrets have no expiry date, so a formulation recorded in transit in 2026 is as valuable to a competitor in 2040 as it is today. Start with the HNDL Risk Calculator and the Third-Party Cryptographic Exposure Model.

US facilities: after CFATS

With CFATS authority lapsed since 28 July 2023, CISA can neither require Top-Screens nor inspect. The 2024 CSAT intrusion is the cautionary tale: the most sensitive site security data in the sector sat behind a remote-access appliance, and the encryption at rest, not the perimeter, was the control that held. NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3 remains the OT baseline, and Executive Order 14412 of June 2026 orders a proposed FAR rule requiring federal contractors to meet PQC-compliant FIPS by 31 December 2030. ChemLock.

Quantum computing as an upside

The same machines that threaten your cryptography are expected to simulate molecules, catalysts and materials beyond what classical chemistry software can manage. Several QSECDEF lectures cover molecular sensing and atomic-scale fabrication. Keep the two conversations apart: the risk programme has dates, the opportunity programme has pilots, and a board that hears only one of them makes the wrong decision on both.

Step 3 of 5

Build a plan your board can sign off in 90 days

By day 30

It has an owner and a scope

  • A PQC migration lead with authority across control, safety, site and enterprise cryptography, and a sponsor on the board.
  • Inventory scoped to OPC UA and VPN certificate chains, vendor remote access, engineering workstations, recipe management, PLM and EDI links and the certificate authorities behind them.
  • Formulations, recipes, safety configurations and records mapped to their useful life and to the algorithms protecting them.
By day 60

You have the evidence

  • OT protocol scan run on one site and the results placed in a zone and conduit model that shows where the SIS and the BPCS share a trust chain.
  • A post-quantum questionnaire with every automation vendor, licensor, toll manufacturer and critical supplier.
  • Device families classified by whether they can change algorithm by update, at a turnaround or not at all.
By day 90

Your board has a plan to approve

  • Sites, product lines and partners ranked by data lifetime, exposure and the 2027 and 2030 dates.
  • Hybrid TLS piloted on one historian or batch server, or a dual-signed certificate of analysis piloted with one customer, with what broke written down.
  • A roadmap with 2027, 2028, 2030 and 2035 milestones, tied to the turnaround calendar, the safety lifecycle and the capital plan.
Who will deliver it? See step 4 →

The five numbers to show your board

  1. Inventory coverageThe share of sites, product lines and enterprise systems with a completed cryptographic inventory, including the safety instrumented systems.
  2. Exposed recipesThe formulations, process recipes and records that must stay confidential beyond 2030 and still move or rest behind RSA or ECC.
  3. Algorithm-fixed devicesHow many controllers, logic solvers and gateways cannot change cryptography without a turnaround or a replacement, and what that costs.
  4. Partner readinessHow many automation vendors, licensors, toll manufacturers and critical suppliers have a dated post-quantum roadmap on file.
  5. Plan statusBudget committed and milestones met against the 2027 CRA date, the 2030 EU target and the 2035 deadline.

How to phase the spend, 2026 to 2035

  1. 2026Discover, scan and change procurementOwner, site-wide inventory, OT protocol scan, device classification and the vendor and partner questionnaire, in line with the EU first-steps milestone. No algorithm-fixed control system enters the estate without a documented agility requirement.
  2. 2027Contracts, the IT-OT boundary and the first turnaroundPQC clauses in automation specifications, licence agreements and toll-manufacturing contracts; hybrid TLS on firewalls, jump servers, historians and batch servers at the IT-OT boundary; the SIS trust chain separated and the algorithm change written into the safety lifecycle plan for the next turnaround.
  3. 2028 to 2030Remote access, partner links and control networksVendor remote access and engineering workstations on hybrid key exchange, EDI, PLM and recipe transfers migrated, OPC UA certificate profiles upgraded where the stack allows, certificates of analysis dual-signed, to meet the EU 2030 target and NIST deprecation.
  4. 2031 to 2035Replace the rest at planned turnaroundsAlgorithm-fixed controllers, logic solvers and gateways replaced within scheduled turnarounds and capital programmes, before RSA and ECC are disallowed in 2035.

Dates from the EU roadmap, the Cyber Resilience Act and NIST IR 8547. For the partner side, see the Quantum-Safe Supply Chain Security for Manufacturers workshop; for budget ranges, our PQC migration cost benchmarks.

Free tools to do it this quarter

Need help delivering the plan? Our expert members are peer-reviewed suppliers, integrators and advisers. Meet the expert members →

Step 4 of 5

Equip the people who will deliver it

A migration succeeds or stalls on people. Match each role to the outcome you need from them.

For your programme lead

Your programme lead can run the migration across control, safety and supply chain

  • Inventory and CBOM auditing for OT, safety systems and enterprise systems
  • Risk prioritisation by data lifetime, device life and the 2027 and 2030 dates
  • Crypto-agile architecture and GRC integration for NIS2, Seveso and COMAH and IEC 62443 evidence
  • Supplier management and a tabletop exercise with your site scenario

CPQCPM, Certified Post Quantum Cryptography Programme Manager. Ten hours live online over five weeks, small cohorts, delivered by Chris Basener of Argus Advisory and certified by QSECDEF. See the full course →

$1,450 a seat · $1,087.50 for members

QSECDEF training · CPQCPM

Watch the overview, then get the brochure, dates and costs

Your brochure, the next cohort dates and the costs are ready on the next page.

We use your email to send QSECDEF updates and news. See our privacy policy.

Board and executives

Your board can challenge the plan, understand why recipe life and the safety case change the maths, and approve a multi-year budget with confidence.

Certified Quantum Business Professional

Self-paced, no physics background. Covers PQC, policy and PQC risk and migration management.

Free first session · included in membership

Get Session 1 free
OT and process control engineers, process safety leads and IT/OT integration teams

Your engineers know where the asymmetric cryptography sits in OPC UA, PROFINET, MQTT and the IIoT edge, which devices can take ML-KEM and ML-DSA, and how to sequence the work across the Purdue model without a trip.

PQC Migration for Industrial Control Systems

Half day, 3 hours, in person or online. ICS exposure assessment, protocol-specific analysis, FIPS 203, 204 and 205 selection for constrained devices, and Purdue-model migration sequencing.

Private delivery · certificate on completion

See the course
Security, risk and IT teams

Your teams understand the threat, the standards and the tools before they start.

Introduction to Quantum Cyber Security

Six modules, 4 to 5 hours, certificated.

Free first module · included in membership

Get Module 1 free
An aerial view of large white storage tanks beside railway sidings with lines of wagons.

Training site, safety and procurement teams together? Put everyone on one plan.

Team membership brings your board, programme lead, process control engineers and security teams up to speed together, tracks what each person has completed and certifies across the group. The courses above are included, plus 170+ expert lectures and the weekly call, and members pay less for CPQCPM.

See team membership

Step 5 of 5

Compare notes with peers running the same units and the same supply chains

A members-only roundtable for chemical and petrochemical CEOs, COOs, CISOs and the heads of OT, process safety and supply chain. It runs under the Chatham House Rule and is facilitated by Anna Beata Kalisz Hedegaard, Founder of QSECDEF.

  • An honest read on where chemical sector peers have reached with PQC across DCS, SIS and enterprise IT, and which layers of the plant are proving hardest to move
  • How peers handle the turnaround constraint: cryptographic changes in environments where a restart is a safety event and a production event at once
  • Which licensor, toll-manufacturer and vendor dependencies carry the most PQC risk, and the contractual and technical options peers have used
  • A calibrated view of quantum simulation for molecules, catalysts and materials: what is being piloted and what is still vendor aspiration
  • How to present quantum risk and quantum opportunity to a board that understands process safety and has not yet connected either to quantum
A QSECDEF symposium panel on stage in front of an audience
Practitioner panels, on the record
QSECDEF members and speakers together outside the Arc de Triomphe in Paris
Peers you can call afterwards
Panellists in discussion at a QSECDEF symposium
Questions taken from the floor
A speaker presenting slides at the QSECDEF World Symposium
Briefings on what is changing
A keynote speaker at the QSECDEF World Symposium lectern
QSECDEF World Symposium, Paris

Lectures from people doing this work

Practitioner lectures from the QSECDEF library that matter most to chemical companies: securing plant networks with PQC, crypto-agility at scale, continuous testing, entropy and QRNGs in the supply chain, SBOM and CBOM, cryptographic inventory, molecular sensing and atomic-scale fabrication.

Browse all expert lectures

Expert contributors represent leading organisations worldwide

Airbus Central R&T
Aireon
Airesatech
Ait
Appliedquantum
Arise Innovations
Arobs
Arqit
Asc Csa
Atlant3D
Bank of Ireland
Barak Azar
Basener Consulting
BHO Legal
Bitcoinqs
Bloq
Buckingham
CloudTech Group
Coherent Computing
Creotech
Cryptalabs
CyberProtonics
Cysec
Cystel
Deimos Space
Department of Digitalization
Dhbw
Dlr
Eclypses
Elpromaelectronics
Engineering
Enluzstrategy
Entrokey Labs
Eptalent
ESA
Esa
Euc
EXATEL
Finqbit
Fraunhofer
Georgetown
GQI
Helix Ft
Ibm
Idquantique
Jagiellonian University
Jos Quantum
Kets Quantum
Kit
Krown Technologies
Kwantumg
Lightriderinc
Linkedin
Lnu
Mbda Systems
Meetiqm
Merqury
Metrosert
Molket
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun
Nokia
Orcacomputing
Osi
Pantherun
Patero
Photonics Foundry
Q Ctrl
Qryptocyber
Qssys
Qticompany
Qtlabs
Quandela
Quant X Sec
Quant.Bond
Quantivate
Quantum Computing Inc
Quantum Dice
Quantumbrilliance
Quantumprime
Quantzen
Qubridge
Qudef
Quranium
Qustream
Reddixgroup
Slater Technologies
Smartcyber Group
Smoad
Sparkle
Swiss Financial Innovation Desk
Technology Innovation Institute (TII)
Thequantuminsider
Tobias Heindel
Tu Braunschweig
University College London
University of Bremen
University of Pisa
Venari Security
Veriqloud
Viavisolutions
Vodafone
Welinq
Wizzwang
Xairos
Youtube
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
HYPATIA Smart Technologies
SAS
Triarii Research
Airbus Central R&T
Aireon
Airesatech
Ait
Appliedquantum
Arise Innovations
Arobs
Arqit
Asc Csa
Atlant3D
Bank of Ireland
Barak Azar
Basener Consulting
BHO Legal
Bitcoinqs
Bloq
Buckingham
CloudTech Group
Coherent Computing
Creotech
Cryptalabs
CyberProtonics
Cysec
Cystel
Deimos Space
Department of Digitalization
Dhbw
Dlr
Eclypses
Elpromaelectronics
Engineering
Enluzstrategy
Entrokey Labs
Eptalent
ESA
Esa
Euc
EXATEL
Finqbit
Fraunhofer
Georgetown
GQI
Helix Ft
Ibm
Idquantique
Jagiellonian University
Jos Quantum
Kets Quantum
Kit
Krown Technologies
Kwantumg
Lightriderinc
Linkedin
Lnu
Mbda Systems
Meetiqm
Merqury
Metrosert
Molket
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun
Nokia
Orcacomputing
Osi
Pantherun
Patero
Photonics Foundry
Q Ctrl
Qryptocyber
Qssys
Qticompany
Qtlabs
Quandela
Quant X Sec
Quant.Bond
Quantivate
Quantum Computing Inc
Quantum Dice
Quantumbrilliance
Quantumprime
Quantzen
Qubridge
Qudef
Quranium
Qustream
Reddixgroup
Slater Technologies
Smartcyber Group
Smoad
Sparkle
Swiss Financial Innovation Desk
Technology Innovation Institute (TII)
Thequantuminsider
Tobias Heindel
Tu Braunschweig
University College London
University of Bremen
University of Pisa
Venari Security
Veriqloud
Viavisolutions
Vodafone
Welinq
Wizzwang
Xairos
Youtube
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
HYPATIA Smart Technologies
SAS
Triarii Research

Expert Membership

Builders, consultancies and technology vendors serving chemicals: talk to us

Expert membership brings you into an open community working across sectors, opening up industry conversations, knowledge and access to experts. If you are building technology or consulting capabilities in this sector relevant to Quantum or Advanced AI, we want to hear from you.

  • Access to all Industry Conversations
  • Speaker opportunities at the annual Paris Symposium
  • Enhanced expert profile with lecture archive
  • Co-branding opportunities and social amplification
  • 25% off partner training and events

Everything you need, in one place

Our analysis and programmes for the chemicals sector

Policy and mandates

Questions leaders ask

Does NIS2 apply to chemical manufacturers?

Yes. Chemicals is one of the other critical sectors in Annex II, which makes medium and large manufacturers, producers and distributors of chemical substances important entities, and a site that also operates a refinery, a gas terminal or a hydrogen plant is an Annex I energy entity as well. Article 21 then requires ten measures, including supply chain security and policies on the use of cryptography and, where appropriate, encryption, and Article 20 makes the management body approve and oversee them. Member States had until 17 October 2024 to transpose the directive, so the obligations now sit in national law.

Does Seveso III or COMAH say anything about cyber security?

Not in those words. Seveso III, which applies to over 11,000 installations across the EU, and COMAH 2015 in Great Britain are safety regimes: they ask an operator to prevent major accidents and limit their consequences through a major accident prevention policy and, for upper-tier sites, a safety report and a safety management system. The link to cryptography is that a control or safety system which can be reached, altered or impersonated is a major accident hazard, and in Great Britain HSE's operational guidance OG86 is how an inspector examines that. Put the cryptographic dependency of the SIS and the BPCS into the safety case and the modification plan, and the inspector's question has an answer.

Can a safety instrumented system run post-quantum cryptography?

Mostly not today, and that is fine as long as you know it. A logic solver certified under IEC 61511 changes only through the safety lifecycle, with a documented modification and a proof test, so the realistic plan is to separate its trust chain from the basic process control system now, protect every path into it with hybrid key exchange at the boundary, and schedule the algorithm change for the turnaround at which the vendor's firmware supports it. The ICS course works through the Purdue model layer by layer, including the Level 0 to 2 deferral strategy.

Why does harvest now, decrypt later matter so much for a chemical company?

Because the recipe does not expire. A formulation, a catalyst system or a set of reaction conditions stays valuable for as long as the product sells, which in agrochemicals and speciality chemicals can be decades, and a trade secret has no legal end date. Any transfer of that recipe over RSA or ECDH key exchange, to a toll manufacturer, into a PLM system or across a vendor's remote tunnel, can be recorded today and read once a cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists. The HNDL Risk Calculator shows how far your data outlives the algorithm protecting it.

What does the Cyber Resilience Act mean for a chemical company?

Two things. The analysers, sensors, dosing equipment, gateways and software you buy will have to meet the CRA's essential requirements when placed on the EU market from 11 December 2027, so your automation specification can ask for them now. And if you sell a connected product of your own, such as a smart dispensing system or monitoring device, you are a manufacturer under the Act, with vulnerability reporting from 11 September 2026 and a technical file that has to say how the product's cryptography can change during its support period.

What happened to CFATS, and what replaces it?

Congress allowed the statutory authority for the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards to lapse on 28 July 2023. CISA can no longer require Top-Screens, inspect or enforce, which affected the 3,200 facilities previously designated as high-risk. Nothing has replaced it yet; CISA offers the voluntary ChemLock programme instead. The sector's own lesson came in January 2024, when the Chemical Security Assessment Tool was breached through an Ivanti appliance: CISA found no evidence of exfiltration and said the data was encrypted with AES-256, which is the symmetric part that holds up against a quantum computer. The remote-access path that let the attacker in is the part that does not.

Which protocols on a chemical plant are quantum-vulnerable?

Any that use RSA or ECDSA for key exchange, certificates or authentication: OPC UA security modes, TLS to historians, batch servers and MES, the VPN or remote-support tunnels your vendors use, and the EDI and AS2 links to suppliers and carriers. Modbus/TCP and PROFINET carry no cryptography at all, which is a different problem, and the symmetric parts such as AES-256 hold up. The OT Protocol Quantum Vulnerability Scanner maps this for the protocols you select.

How exposed is the chemical supply chain?

More than the plant, usually. Toll manufacturers run your process under licence and hold the recipe. Raw material suppliers exchange orders over EDI with RSA key exchange. Carriers and terminals receive hazardous goods documentation, and customers trust a signed certificate of analysis for every batch. Any of that traffic recorded now is readable later, and a forged signature on a batch certificate arrives in a customer's plant as your product. NIS2 Article 21 puts supply chain security on your list, and your largest customers will flow their own requirements down. Start with the Third-Party Cryptographic Exposure Model and a questionnaire to every licensor and toll manufacturer.

Where should a chemical company start?

With a cryptographic inventory that spans control, safety, site and enterprise systems; a map of which formulations, recipes and records must stay confidential beyond 2030; a classification of controllers and logic solvers by whether they can change algorithm by update, at a turnaround or not at all; and roadmaps requested from every automation vendor, licensor and toll manufacturer. Those four give the board the evidence to set priorities and fit the work to the turnaround calendar and the safety lifecycle.

What does QSECDEF offer chemical companies for free?

Everything on this page. The two-minute readiness check scores your site and supply chain security programme and routes you to the right next step. The free tools, including the OT Protocol Quantum Vulnerability Scanner and the HNDL Risk Calculator, run in your browser with no registration. The weekly peer call runs every Tuesday at 15:00 CET and is open to anyone. Sample lectures from the 170-plus expert library are linked above, and the page is reviewed as the mandates change; the date beside the key facts is the last check.

Which QSECDEF course should a chemicals team take first?

It depends on the role. Boards and executives start with the Certified Quantum Business Professional bootcamp, about 22 hours self-paced across ten modules. Security, risk and IT teams take Introduction to Quantum Cyber Security, four to five hours online with a QSECDEF certificate. OT and process control engineers, process safety leads and IT/OT integration teams take PQC Migration for Industrial Control Systems, the sector course for SCADA, DCS and ICS environments, and procurement and supplier security teams take Quantum-Safe Supply Chain Security for Manufacturers. Whoever will run the migration takes CPQCPM, the Certified Post Quantum Cryptography Programme Manager course: ten hours live online over five weeks, with the next public cohort in January 2027.

Can QSECDEF run private training or a workshop for our site, group or supply chain?

Yes. QSECDEF runs private CPQCPM cohorts for a single organisation, live online or in person, and private deliveries of the sector courses listed under Equip your people for your OT, process safety and supply chain teams. Board and leadership workshops are built on your own exposure and obligations and end with an agreed position on quantum risk. Use the contact button in the For your organisation section and tell us your timeline.

How do we find vetted suppliers or consultants for a chemicals PQC migration?

Through the QSECDEF Expert Members directory. Every listed member has been vetted, has signed the Members' Charter and has presented to the community. You can filter by consulting and services, technology vendor or enablement and investment, and send a request for further information from the member's own page. QSECDEF is vendor-neutral and sells training, not migration products, so the shortlist stays yours.

Is QSECDEF membership relevant to a chemical company?

Two routes. QSECDEF membership gives your team the self-paced courses, the full lecture archive, the weekly call and 25 per cent off CPQCPM and partner training. Expert Membership is for the builders, consultancies and technology vendors serving chemicals who want to be found by the people reading this page; it includes a showcase listing with an enquiry form, the Industry Conversations and speaking slots at the annual QSECDEF symposium.

Is QSECDEF selling a migration product?

No. QSECDEF is a vendor-neutral membership network. We train people and connect them with peers and peer-reviewed experts; we do not sell migration software or services.

How much time does the training take?

CPQCPM is ten hours of live instruction over five weeks, two hours a week. The Quantum Cyber Security course is 4 to 5 hours, self-paced. The business bootcamp is self-paced at your own speed. The industrial courses are listed with their formats on the training pages: the ICS course is a half day of three hours, the supply chain workshop a full day of six hours.

Ask a practitioner, live

The free weekly call runs every Tuesday at 15:00 CET. Bring your question.

Join the Tuesday call →
Four colleagues standing at a white wall, one writing on it while the others watch, seen from behind.

For your organisation

Need it built around your sites, your products or your supply chain?

When your board, your largest customer or your group security function needs something specific, we shape the workshop, the training or the engagement around your sites, your product portfolio and your turnaround calendar. Independent of any vendor.

Custom workshops

Your leadership leaves with an agreed position on quantum risk and quantum opportunity

In-person sessions for chemical companies drawn from the industrial workshop programme: PQC migration for industrial control systems, quantum-safe supply chain security, quantum optimisation for production scheduling and quantum simulation for molecules and materials.

Private training

Your site, safety and procurement teams trained on one plan

Private CPQCPM cohorts, live online or in person for your required delegates, private deliveries of the ICS and supply chain courses, and team membership for the self-paced courses.

Consulting

A migration programme specified and staffed correctly

Cryptographic inventory, OT and safety system assessment, PQC migration planning, licensor and toll-manufacturer review and specialist teams sourced from 1,500+ members across 900+ organisations.

Prefer email? Write to info@qsecdef.com and tell us about your timeline.

Photos: Pexels (adel bouzid, https://kaboompics.com/, Diego F. Parra, Sergey Sergeev, Clarence Cooper, Jakub Pabis, Tom Fisk, ThisIsEngineering) and QSECDEF, converted to black and white or brand duotone.