A combine harvester working a wheat field in low golden light, with a line of trees behind it.

For the CISOs, OT and plant engineers, supply chain directors, quality and food safety leads and boards of food and drink manufacturers, farms and co-operatives, agri-tech suppliers, cold chain operators and retailers' supply chain teams

Quantum risk in food and agriculture

The filling line you commission this year will still be running when the algorithm protecting it is gone.

In fifteen minutes you will know which of your recipes, lot records, cold chain telemetry and farm data are already exposed, what NIS2, the EU Data Act and FSMA 204 let an auditor, a retailer or the FDA ask about cryptography, and the first 90 days of a plan that fits a production calendar and a harvest.

  • Your exposure, site by site and link by link from field to shelf
  • The evidence a NIS2 auditor, a retailer's technical audit or the FDA can ask for
  • A 90-day plan that respects production runs and the season
  • The right training for each role
1,500+
professional members
900+
organisations represented
40+
countries
Vendor-neutral
based on evidence, not hype

Proud to recommend our expert members

Qrypto Cyber
Eclypses
Arqit
QuantBond
Krown
Applied Quantum
Quantum Bitcoin
Venari Security
QuStream
BHO Legal
Census
QSP
IONQ - ID Quantique
Patero
Entopya
Belden
Atlant3D
Zenith Studio
Qudef
Aries Partners
GQI
Upperside Conferences
Austrade
Arrise Innovations
CyberRST
Triarii Research
QSysteme
WizzWang
DeepTech DAO
Xyberteq
Viavi
Entrust
Qsentinel
Nokia
Gopher Security
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
Qrypto Cyber
Eclypses
Arqit
QuantBond
Krown
Applied Quantum
Quantum Bitcoin
Venari Security
QuStream
BHO Legal
Census
QSP
IONQ - ID Quantique
Patero
Entopya
Belden
Atlant3D
Zenith Studio
Qudef
Aries Partners
GQI
Upperside Conferences
Austrade
Arrise Innovations
CyberRST
Triarii Research
QSysteme
WizzWang
DeepTech DAO
Xyberteq
Viavi
Entrust
Qsentinel
Nokia
Gopher Security
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
A worker in a blue apron and hairnet at a stainless steel table in a bright food preparation room, seen from behind.
Installed once. Filling, chilling and reporting for twenty years.

Step 1 of 5

Know which of your recipes, records and links are already exposed

A packaging line installed in 2026 will still be running in 2046, and the recipe it follows will still be the recipe. The VPN that carries its telemetry, the TLS session behind your retailer EDI and the certificate on a tractor's telematics gateway all authenticate with RSA or ECDSA, the algorithms a cryptographically relevant quantum computer breaks. Nobody needs that computer today. They record the traffic now and read it when it arrives. This is a sector criminals already find easy: the FBI counted six grain co-operatives hit by ransomware between 15 September and 6 October 2021, timed to the harvest, and JBS paid the equivalent of $11 million in June 2021. Recording is quieter than ransomware, and in food the data outlives the algorithm protecting it.

Food and agriculture records that must stay confidential beyond the post-quantum deadlines
Record typeTypical lifetime or retentionConfidential until, if created in 2026
Recipes, formulations, process parameters and cleaning cyclesLife of the product and the brand, often 20 years or more2046+
Supplier contracts, ingredient pricing and volume commitmentsContract term plus renegotiation cycles, 5 to 10 years2031 to 2036
Traceability and lot records, including FSMA 204 key data elementsRegulatory and customer retention beyond shelf life; integrity matters as much as secrecyLife of the record, and whenever the FDA asks within 24 hours
Cold chain telemetry, temperature logs and reefer telematicsAudit and claims retention, often 3 to 7 years2029 to 2033
Farm and yield data, field maps, connected machinery telemetry and satellite imageryLife of the holding; a competitor's value in it does not expireOpen-ended
Retailer and customer EDI, orders, forecasts and promotional calendarsContract and promotion cycles, 2 to 5 years2028 to 2031
Food safety, HACCP and certification audit recordsCertification cycles and product liability, up to 10 years2036
Personal data of employees, seasonal workers and direct customersLife of the relationship plus statutory retention2032, and for as long as the person is identifiable

Lifetimes are typical of the asset class and are not statutory; check them against your retention schedule, your retailer contracts and the record-keeping rules of each market you sell into. Traceability in the EU rests on the one step back, one step forward rule of the General Food Law; in the US, FSMA 204 records must reach the FDA within 24 hours of a request. For the method, see what to protect first when data outlives the algorithm.

Where your exposure sits, and what you will know

The inside of a white cold room with crates stacked on racks and a refrigeration unit on the ceiling.

The plant and the farm: lines, controllers and connected machinery

Filling, packaging and batch lines run on PLCs that speak Modbus/TCP or PROFINET, which carry no cryptography, inside TLS and VPN tunnels that do. In the field, ISOBUS was built so a tractor and an implement from different makers could talk; confidentiality sits in the telematics gateway and the cloud link, keyed with RSA or ECDSA certificates. A dosing controller or a yield monitor bought in 2026 is still in service in 2041.

You will know which lines and machines carry a quantum-vulnerable handshake, which gateways and historians can take hybrid key exchange now, and which controllers wait for a planned stop or the next replacement.

A grain silo complex with a tall tower and storage bins standing in flat green farmland under a pale sky.

The chain: cold chain telemetry, EDI, traceability platforms and logistics

Temperature loggers and reefer units report over cellular TLS. Orders, despatch advices and invoices move over EDI and AS2 with certificates renewed every year or two. Lot and traceability records sit in platforms your retailers and the FDA can call for. The NAO lists exposure to cyber incidents affecting temperature-control, monitoring and logistics systems as a key risk to the UK cold chain.

You will know which links to migrate first because both ends already support hybrid TLS, which depend on a third-party platform's roadmap, and what to write into the next logistics and EDI contract.

The legs and udder of a cow in a milking stall, with automated milking cups attached and a steel churn beside her.

The business: ERP, retailer portals, recipe systems and payments

ERP, recipe and specification management, retailer portals, payments and email run on standard IT. They hold the formulations, the pricing and the promotional calendar, and they are where the 2025 attacks on UK retailers landed. Most of it runs on hardware that already supports post-quantum key exchange.

You will know which corporate systems carry harvest now, decrypt later risk and can migrate this year, and which third-party portals need a roadmap from the vendor before you can close the gap.

Free readiness check

Score your sites and your supply chain in two minutes

Eight questions mapped to what a NIS2 auditor, a retailer's technical audit, the FDA and your board can ask about cryptography. You get a score, your top three priorities and the next step that closes your biggest gap. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Start the check
1Do you have a cryptographic inventory that covers the plant floor, the cold chain, the farm equipment you own or connect to, and the enterprise systems behind them?

NIS2 lists the use of cryptography among the ten measures every entity in scope must address, and food production, processing and distribution is an Annex II sector. You cannot write a policy for keys you have not listed.

2Do you know which controllers, loggers, gateways and machines can accept new cryptography by firmware update, and which cannot?

ML-KEM and ML-DSA keys and signatures are far larger than their RSA and ECC equivalents. Flash, RAM and a 9,600 baud radio link decide whether migration is a software release, a gateway in front of the device or a replacement.

3Have you mapped which recipes, contracts and records must stay confidential beyond 2030 against the algorithms protecting them today?

A formulation recorded in transit between your R&D system and a co-manufacturer now can be read once a cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists. A 20-year brand is well inside that window.

4Have your machinery makers, automation vendors, cold chain platform and EDI providers given you a dated post-quantum roadmap?

Telematics, traceability and temperature platforms are bought in, and both ends of a link must migrate. Their timeline is your timeline, and most have not been asked.

5Is there a named owner and a budget line for post-quantum migration that spans plant, farm, supply chain and IT?

In food the work falls between engineering, quality, procurement, logistics and IT. Without an owner it belongs to nobody and misses the next capital cycle.

6Has your board, your co-operative's council or your management body been briefed on quantum risk in the last 12 months?

NIS2 makes management bodies approve and oversee cyber security measures and includes provisions on the liability of senior managers. Retailers' audits increasingly ask the same questions.

7Could you produce your traceability and lot records within 24 hours, and show they have not been altered in transit or at rest?

FSMA 204 requires records within 24 hours of an FDA request and sortable spreadsheets during an outbreak. EU traceability relies on the one step back, one step forward rule. Signatures and integrity checks on those records rest on algorithms NIST will deprecate in 2030.

8Does every new line specification, machine purchase and supplier contract require crypto-agility and a post-quantum roadmap from the vendor?

Equipment bought in 2026 will still be on the floor in 2046, and connected products placed on the EU market from December 2027 fall under the Cyber Resilience Act. Each algorithm-fixed device you accept now is a replacement you pay for twice.

Step 2 of 5

Know what NIS2, the Data Act, FSMA 204 and your retailers will expect, and when

  1. 2024

    Standards and rules

    The EU Data Act enters into force on 11 January. NIST publishes FIPS 203, 204 and 205 in August. Member States had to transpose NIS2, which lists the production, processing and distribution of food among its other critical sectors, by 17 October. The Cyber Resilience Act enters into force on 10 December.

  2. 2025

    Roadmaps and farm data

    The UK NCSC publishes its migration timeline in March. The EU Coordinated Implementation Roadmap follows on 23 June. The Data Act applies from 12 September, giving farmers and other users the right to the data their connected machines produce. In August the FDA proposes a 30-month extension of the FSMA 204 compliance date.

  3. 2026

    EU first steps and access by design

    CRA vulnerability reporting applies from 11 September. Connected products placed on the EU market after 12 September must give users access to their data by design. The NAO reports on 4 September that food is a UK critical national infrastructure sector but sits outside the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill. Member States should have national PQC roadmaps in place by year end. NIST IR 8547 is final in October.

  4. 2028

    CRA in force, UK discovery done, FSMA enforced

    Products with digital elements placed on the EU market since 11 December 2027 must meet the CRA's essential requirements, and the Machinery Regulation has applied since 20 January 2027. The NCSC expects discovery and an initial plan by 2028. The FDA will not enforce the Food Traceability Rule before 20 July 2028.

  5. 2030

    High-risk migrated

    EU target for high-risk use cases, critical infrastructure included. NIST deprecates 112-bit RSA and ECC. A reefer fleet or a packaging line bought in 2026 is four years into a fifteen-to-twenty-year life.

  6. 2035

    RSA and ECC disallowed

    NIST disallows them. The EU roadmap and the NCSC timeline end here. The recipe you protected with RSA in 2026 is still the recipe.

Key facts for food and agriculture, checked 30 October 2026

  • The Commission Recommendation of 11 April 2024 (C(2024) 2393) asks every Member State to adopt a national post-quantum strategy and to deploy post-quantum cryptography, hybrid where needed, across public administration systems and critical infrastructure. European Commission
  • The EU Coordinated Implementation Roadmap, published through the NIS Cooperation Group on 23 June 2025, asks Member States to start the transition and have national roadmaps in place by the end of 2026, to migrate high-risk use cases by the end of 2030 and as many systems as feasible by the end of 2035. European Commission
  • Securing Tomorrow, Today, the joint statement of cyber security agencies from EU Member States first issued in November 2024 and re-issued with further signatories in July 2025, treats the quantum threat as part of cyber security risk management now and calls for hybrid post-quantum deployment. BSI
  • NIS2 Annex II lists the production, processing and distribution of food as an other critical sector, covering food businesses as defined in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 that are engaged in wholesale distribution and industrial production and processing. Article 21 requires every entity in scope to address ten measures, including supply chain security and policies on the use of cryptography and encryption. Member States had until 17 October 2024 to transpose it, and the Directive includes provisions on the liability of natural persons in senior management positions. EUR-Lex and European Commission
  • The Cyber Resilience Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, entered into force on 10 December 2024. Reporting obligations for actively exploited vulnerabilities apply from 11 September 2026 and the main obligations, including the essential cybersecurity requirements for hardware and software products with digital elements, from 11 December 2027. European Commission
  • The EU Data Act entered into force on 11 January 2024 and has applied since 12 September 2025. It gives individuals and businesses the right to access the data produced through their use of smart objects, machines and devices, to share it with third parties such as repair and maintenance providers, and requires connected devices on the EU market to be designed to allow data sharing. European Commission
  • CEMA, the European agricultural machinery industry association, reads the Data Act's access-by-design duty under Article 3(1) as applying to products placed on the market after 12 September 2026, with unfair terms in contracts concluded before 12 September 2025 to be addressed by September 2027. Its April 2025 Q&A tells manufacturers they must still maintain safety, security and the protection of trade secrets. CEMA
  • The EU Code of conduct on agricultural data sharing by contractual agreement, published in 2018 by Copa-Cogeca, CEMA and other EU agri-food associations, is voluntary. It keeps the farmer at the heart of the collection, processing and management of agricultural data, treats the farmer as the data originator and lists privacy and security among its chapters. Copa-Cogeca
  • The Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230, adopted on 14 June 2023, applies on a mandatory basis from 20 January 2027 and integrates provisions for cyber-safety for compliance-relevant software, data and safety control systems. Machinery placed on the market before that date must comply with the Machinery Directive. European Commission
  • The UK NCSC timeline of 20 March 2025 asks organisations to complete discovery and an initial plan by 2028, to finish the highest-priority migrations by 2031 and to complete migration by 2035. It singles out OT and extensive physical infrastructure for their slow replacement cycles. UK NCSC
  • The National Audit Office report Resilience of the food supply chain to disruptions (HC 587, 4 September 2026) records that food is one of 13 UK critical national infrastructure sectors, that the government's CNI Knowledge Base has historically not covered the food supply chain, that Defra's food exercises since 2023 have focused on cyber incidents, that exposure to cyber incidents affecting temperature-control, monitoring and logistics systems is a key risk to the cold chain, and that the food supply chain is not within scope of the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill. UK National Audit Office
  • CISA's Food and Agriculture Sector page puts agriculture, food and related industries at 5.6 per cent of US GDP and 10.4 per cent of US employment, across an estimated 1.9 million farms, more than 700,000 restaurants and more than 220,000 registered facilities in food manufacturing, processing and storage, almost entirely privately owned and dependent on the water, transportation, energy and chemicals sectors. CISA
  • FBI Private Industry Notification 20210901-001 of 1 September 2021 warns that ransomware actors target the food and agriculture sector, which is increasingly reliant on smart technologies, industrial control systems and internet-based automation systems, and cites a US bakery shut down for about a week in July 2021 after Sodinokibi/REvil ransomware arrived through its managed service provider's software. FBI, via IC3
  • FBI Private Industry Notification 20220420-001 of 20 April 2022, coordinated with CISA and USDA, reports ransomware attacks on six grain co-operatives between 15 September and 6 October 2021 using Conti, BlackMatter, Suncrypt, Sodinokibi and BlackByte, and two further attacks in early 2022 that could disrupt the supply of seed and fertiliser for planting. FBI, via IC3
  • JBS USA confirmed on 9 June 2021 that it paid the equivalent of $11 million in ransom after the cyberattack of 30 May 2021, at a point when the vast majority of its facilities were operational. JBS Foods
  • The Food and Ag-ISAC 2025 Ransomware Report counts 265 ransomware attacks on the food and agriculture sector in 2025, up from 206 in 2024, or 4.2 per cent of the ransomware volume it tracked across all critical sectors, with the early-2025 spike driven by CL0P's exploitation of a Cleo managed file transfer vulnerability. Food and Ag-ISAC
  • The FDA's Food Traceability Rule under FSMA section 204 requires key data elements for critical tracking events (harvesting, cooling, initial packing, first land-based receiving, shipping, receiving and transformation) for foods on the Food Traceability List, available to the FDA within 24 hours of a request. The original compliance date was 20 January 2026; the FDA proposed a 30-month extension to 20 July 2028, and the Continuing Appropriations Act of 2026 directed the FDA not to enforce the rule before that date, a directive the FDA says it intends to comply with. US FDA
  • NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3, Guide to Operational Technology Security, published in September 2023, covers industrial control systems including SCADA, DCS and PLCs and recommends countermeasures that account for the performance, reliability and safety requirements of OT. NIST
  • The final NIST IR 8547, published 27 October 2026, deprecates quantum-vulnerable public-key cryptography after 2030 and disallows it after 2035. NIST
Rows of young lettuce growing in white hydroponic channels stacked in tiers.

The evidence you will be able to show

NIS2 Article 21

A cryptography policy backed by an inventory

You show: A documented policy on the use of cryptography and encryption, and the inventory behind it, covering plant, cold chain, farm equipment and enterprise systems, with quantum-vulnerable algorithms flagged.

FSMA 204 and EU traceability

Traceability records whose integrity you can defend

You show: A record of which signature and integrity algorithms protect lot and traceability data at each critical tracking event, and the dated path to post-quantum signatures before the 2030 deprecation.

Data Act, CRA and the Machinery Regulation

Connected machines and products that can change algorithm

You show: For agri-tech and machinery makers, a technical file per product family recording the cryptography in use, the declared support period and the path to post-quantum; for buyers, the same information on file from each supplier.

EU roadmap and NCSC timeline

A named lead and dated milestones

You show: A PQC migration lead, a plan with the EU end-2026 and 2030 milestones and the NCSC 2028 and 2031 milestones, and roadmaps on file from each machinery maker, platform provider and logistics partner.

A worker in a blue apron and hairnet at a stainless steel table in a bright food preparation room, seen from behind.

UK food businesses and farms. The NCSC timeline sets the pace: discovery and a plan by 2028, highest-priority migration by 2031, complete by 2035. The NAO's September 2026 report found that Defra is less confident about the ability of food businesses to withstand shocks without government help over the next five to ten years, that the NCSC's support for nationally significant organisations includes all major food retailers, and that the food supply chain is not within scope of the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill. Nobody is going to mandate this for you. Anything you place on the EU market still falls under the Cyber Resilience Act from 11 December 2027, wherever it is made. Read the NCSC position explained.

Agri-tech and machinery makers

Three regulations land on a connected tractor, sprayer or sensor at once. The Data Act has applied since 12 September 2025 and requires access by design for products placed on the market after 12 September 2026; the Machinery Regulation applies from 20 January 2027; the Cyber Resilience Act's essential requirements apply from 11 December 2027. Each asks for a product that can prove who may read its data and whose signature it trusts, and all three outlast the algorithms doing that today. The 2018 code of conduct put the farmer at the heart of agricultural data; the Data Act makes that a right. See the manufacturing page for firmware signing, secure boot and the CRA technical file.

Cold chain and distribution operators

Reefer telematics, warehouse management, temperature monitoring and the EDI that moves despatch advices all key with RSA or ECDSA certificates, and the NAO names cyber incidents affecting temperature-control, monitoring and logistics systems as a key risk to the UK cold chain. A refrigerated trailer runs fifteen years; its telematics unit was specified once. Treat the fleet like an OT estate: classify what can update, put a post-quantum gateway in front of what cannot, and write crypto-agility into the next fleet and warehouse system tender. See the transport page and the retail and logistics workshops.

Retailers' supply chain teams

Your supplier technical audits already ask about cyber security; the 2025 attacks on UK retailers put the question on every board agenda. Add three lines: a cryptographic inventory, a post-quantum roadmap and crypto-agility in the EDI and portal integrations your suppliers use. FSMA 204 sortable spreadsheets and EU traceability records are only as trustworthy as the signatures on them. Read how to evaluate vendor quantum readiness.

US food and agriculture

CISA treats food and agriculture as one of the sixteen critical infrastructure sectors, 5.6 per cent of GDP and almost entirely privately owned. The FBI's 2021 and 2022 notifications show how the sector is attacked: through managed service providers, unpatched systems and timing to the harvest. NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3 is the OT security baseline and NIST IR 8547 sets the 2030 and 2035 dates. FSMA 204 gives traceability records a regulator who can ask for them within 24 hours from 20 July 2028. Read the OT and SCADA assessment framework.

Step 3 of 5

Build a plan your board can sign off in 90 days

By day 30

It has an owner and a scope

  • A PQC migration lead with authority across plant, farm, supply chain and enterprise cryptography, and a sponsor on the board or the co-operative's council.
  • Inventory scoped to vendor VPNs, EDI and AS2 certificates, telematics and cold chain gateways, traceability platforms, retailer portals and the HSMs behind them.
  • Recipes, contracts, lot records and farm data mapped to their useful life and to the algorithms protecting them.
By day 60

You have the evidence

  • Third-party exposure scored for every machinery maker, automation vendor, platform provider and logistics partner, and a post-quantum questionnaire sent to each.
  • OT protocol scan run on one site and one cold store, and the results placed in a zone and conduit model.
  • Device families on the line, in the fleet and in the field classified by whether they can change algorithm by update, by retrofit or not at all.
By day 90

Your board has a plan to approve

  • Sites, links and suppliers ranked by data lifetime, exposure and the 2027, 2028 and 2030 dates.
  • Hybrid TLS piloted on one EDI connection or one historian, with what broke written down.
  • A roadmap with 2027, 2028, 2030 and 2035 milestones, tied to the production calendar, the season and the capital plan.
Who will deliver it? See step 4 →

The five numbers to show your board

  1. Inventory coverageThe share of sites, fleets, farms and enterprise systems with a completed cryptographic inventory.
  2. Exposed recipes and recordsThe formulations, contracts and traceability records that must stay confidential or provably intact beyond 2030 and still move or rest behind RSA or ECC.
  3. Algorithm-fixed devicesHow many controllers, loggers, telematics units and machines cannot change cryptography without a hardware change, and what replacing them costs.
  4. Supplier readinessHow many machinery makers, platform providers, logistics partners and EDI counterparties have a dated post-quantum roadmap on file.
  5. Plan statusBudget committed and milestones met against the 2027 CRA date, the 2028 FSMA and NCSC dates, the 2030 EU target and the 2035 deadline.

How to phase the spend, 2026 to 2035

  1. 2026Discover, score suppliers and change procurementOwner, inventory across plant, chain and business, third-party exposure model, OT protocol scan, device classification and the vendor questionnaire, in line with the EU first-steps milestone. No algorithm-fixed line, logger or machine enters the estate without a documented agility requirement.
  2. 2027Contracts, EDI and the IT-OT boundaryPQC clauses in machine specifications, EDI agreements and logistics contracts, hybrid TLS on firewalls, jump servers, historians and the EDI gateway, and, for agri-tech makers, crypto-agile designs for every product the CRA reaches from December.
  3. 2028 to 2030Traceability, platforms and fleet linksTraceability and lot records signed with ML-DSA or a hash-based signature before FSMA 204 enforcement from July 2028, cold chain, telematics and retailer portal links on hybrid key exchange as each platform's roadmap allows, to meet the EU 2030 target and NIST deprecation.
  4. 2031 to 2035Replace the rest at planned stops and fleet renewalsAlgorithm-fixed PLCs, loggers and telematics units replaced within line upgrades, fleet renewals and machinery replacement cycles, before RSA and ECC are disallowed in 2035.

Dates from the EU roadmap, the Cyber Resilience Act, the FDA's Food Traceability Rule page and NIST IR 8547. For the supplier side, see the Quantum-Safe Supply Chain Security for Manufacturers workshop; for budget ranges, our PQC migration cost benchmarks.

Free tools to do it this quarter

Need help delivering the plan? Our expert members are peer-reviewed suppliers, integrators and advisers. Meet the expert members →

Step 4 of 5

Equip the people who will deliver it

A migration succeeds or stalls on people. Match each role to the outcome you need from them.

For your programme lead

Your programme lead can run the migration from field to shelf

  • Inventory and CBOM auditing for plant OT, cold chain platforms, connected machinery and enterprise systems
  • Risk prioritisation by data lifetime, device life and the 2027, 2028 and 2030 dates
  • Crypto-agile architecture and GRC integration for NIS2, retailer audit and FSMA 204 evidence
  • Supplier management and a tabletop exercise with your site and cold chain scenario

CPQCPM, Certified Post Quantum Cryptography Programme Manager. Ten hours live online over five weeks, small cohorts, delivered by Chris Basener of Argus Advisory and certified by QSECDEF. See the full course →

$1,450 a seat · $1,087.50 for members

QSECDEF training · CPQCPM

Watch the overview, then get the brochure, dates and costs

Your brochure, the next cohort dates and the costs are ready on the next page.

We use your email to send QSECDEF updates and news. See our privacy policy.

Board, executives and co-operative councils

Your board can challenge the plan, understand why brand life and equipment life change the maths, and approve a multi-year budget with confidence.

Certified Quantum Business Professional

Self-paced, no physics background. Covers PQC, policy and PQC risk and migration management.

Free first session · included in membership

Get Session 1 free
OT security leads, plant and cold chain engineers and IT/OT integration teams

Your engineers know where the asymmetric cryptography sits in OPC UA, PROFINET, MQTT and the telematics edge, which devices can take ML-KEM and ML-DSA, and how to sequence the work across the Purdue model without stopping production.

PQC Migration for Industrial Control Systems

Half day, 3 hours, in person or online. ICS exposure assessment, protocol-specific analysis, FIPS 203, 204 and 205 selection for constrained devices, and Purdue-model migration sequencing.

Private delivery · certificate on completion

See the course
Security, quality, food safety and IT teams

Your teams understand the threat, the standards and the tools before they start, and can explain to a retailer auditor why a traceability record's signature matters.

Introduction to Quantum Cyber Security

Six modules, 4 to 5 hours, certificated.

Free first module · included in membership

Get Module 1 free
The inside of a white cold room with crates stacked on racks and a refrigeration unit on the ceiling.

Training plant, quality, procurement and logistics teams together? Put everyone on one plan.

Team membership brings your board, programme lead, OT engineers, quality leads and security teams up to speed together, tracks what each person has completed and certifies across the group. The courses above are included, plus 170+ expert lectures and the weekly call, and members pay less for CPQCPM.

See team membership

Step 5 of 5

Compare notes with peers working the same threat picture

A members-only roundtable for the CEOs, COOs, CISOs and the heads of OT, supply chain and quality of food and drink manufacturers, co-operatives, agri-tech suppliers and cold chain operators. It runs under the Chatham House Rule and is facilitated by Anna Beata Kalisz Hedegaard, Founder of QSECDEF.

  • An honest read on where food and agriculture peers have reached with PQC across lines, cold stores, fleets and enterprise IT, and which parts of the chain are proving hardest to move
  • How peers handle the production constraint: cryptographic upgrades in plants where a stop spoils product and in fleets that never come back to one depot
  • Which supplier and platform dependencies carry the most PQC risk, and the contractual and technical options peers have used with machinery makers and logistics providers
  • What retailer technical audits and regulators are starting to ask about cryptography, and how peers answer before they have finished the inventory
  • A calibrated view of quantum optimisation for routing, scheduling and demand forecasting: what works today and what is still vendor aspiration
A QSECDEF symposium panel on stage in front of an audience
Practitioner panels, on the record
QSECDEF members and speakers together outside the Arc de Triomphe in Paris
Peers you can call afterwards
Panellists in discussion at a QSECDEF symposium
Questions taken from the floor
A speaker presenting slides at the QSECDEF World Symposium
Briefings on what is changing
A keynote speaker at the QSECDEF World Symposium lectern
QSECDEF World Symposium, Paris

Lectures from people doing this work

Practitioner lectures from the QSECDEF library that matter most to food and agriculture: securing plant and fleet networks with PQC, crypto-agility at scale, continuous testing, entropy and QRNGs in the supply chain, SBOM and CBOM, cryptographic inventory, post-quantum blockchain for traceability and quantum optimisation.

Browse all expert lectures

Expert contributors represent leading organisations worldwide

Airbus Central R&T
Aireon
Airesatech
Ait
Appliedquantum
Arise Innovations
Arobs
Arqit
Asc Csa
Atlant3D
Bank of Ireland
Barak Azar
Basener Consulting
BHO Legal
Bitcoinqs
Bloq
Buckingham
CloudTech Group
Coherent Computing
Creotech
Cryptalabs
CyberProtonics
Cysec
Cystel
Deimos Space
Department of Digitalization
Dhbw
Dlr
Eclypses
Elpromaelectronics
Engineering
Enluzstrategy
Entrokey Labs
Eptalent
ESA
Esa
Euc
EXATEL
Finqbit
Fraunhofer
Georgetown
GQI
Helix Ft
Ibm
Idquantique
Jagiellonian University
Jos Quantum
Kets Quantum
Kit
Krown Technologies
Kwantumg
Lightriderinc
Linkedin
Lnu
Mbda Systems
Meetiqm
Merqury
Metrosert
Molket
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun
Nokia
Orcacomputing
Osi
Pantherun
Patero
Photonics Foundry
Q Ctrl
Qryptocyber
Qssys
Qticompany
Qtlabs
Quandela
Quant X Sec
Quant.Bond
Quantivate
Quantum Computing Inc
Quantum Dice
Quantumbrilliance
Quantumprime
Quantzen
Qubridge
Qudef
Quranium
Qustream
Reddixgroup
Slater Technologies
Smartcyber Group
Smoad
Sparkle
Swiss Financial Innovation Desk
Technology Innovation Institute (TII)
Thequantuminsider
Tobias Heindel
Tu Braunschweig
University College London
University of Bremen
University of Pisa
Venari Security
Veriqloud
Viavisolutions
Vodafone
Welinq
Wizzwang
Xairos
Youtube
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
HYPATIA Smart Technologies
SAS
Triarii Research
Airbus Central R&T
Aireon
Airesatech
Ait
Appliedquantum
Arise Innovations
Arobs
Arqit
Asc Csa
Atlant3D
Bank of Ireland
Barak Azar
Basener Consulting
BHO Legal
Bitcoinqs
Bloq
Buckingham
CloudTech Group
Coherent Computing
Creotech
Cryptalabs
CyberProtonics
Cysec
Cystel
Deimos Space
Department of Digitalization
Dhbw
Dlr
Eclypses
Elpromaelectronics
Engineering
Enluzstrategy
Entrokey Labs
Eptalent
ESA
Esa
Euc
EXATEL
Finqbit
Fraunhofer
Georgetown
GQI
Helix Ft
Ibm
Idquantique
Jagiellonian University
Jos Quantum
Kets Quantum
Kit
Krown Technologies
Kwantumg
Lightriderinc
Linkedin
Lnu
Mbda Systems
Meetiqm
Merqury
Metrosert
Molket
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun
Nokia
Orcacomputing
Osi
Pantherun
Patero
Photonics Foundry
Q Ctrl
Qryptocyber
Qssys
Qticompany
Qtlabs
Quandela
Quant X Sec
Quant.Bond
Quantivate
Quantum Computing Inc
Quantum Dice
Quantumbrilliance
Quantumprime
Quantzen
Qubridge
Qudef
Quranium
Qustream
Reddixgroup
Slater Technologies
Smartcyber Group
Smoad
Sparkle
Swiss Financial Innovation Desk
Technology Innovation Institute (TII)
Thequantuminsider
Tobias Heindel
Tu Braunschweig
University College London
University of Bremen
University of Pisa
Venari Security
Veriqloud
Viavisolutions
Vodafone
Welinq
Wizzwang
Xairos
Youtube
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
HYPATIA Smart Technologies
SAS
Triarii Research

Expert Membership

Builders, consultancies and technology vendors serving food and agriculture: talk to us

Expert membership brings you into an open community working across sectors, opening up industry conversations, knowledge and access to experts. If you are building technology or consulting capabilities in this sector relevant to Quantum or Advanced AI, we want to hear from you.

  • Access to all Industry Conversations
  • Speaker opportunities at the annual Paris Symposium
  • Enhanced expert profile with lecture archive
  • Co-branding opportunities and social amplification
  • 25% off partner training and events

Everything you need, in one place

Our analysis and programmes for food and agriculture

Policy and mandates

Questions leaders ask

Does NIS2 apply to food and drink manufacturers, and does it require post-quantum cryptography?

It applies, and not by name. Annex II of NIS2 lists the production, processing and distribution of food as an other critical sector, covering food businesses engaged in wholesale distribution and industrial production and processing. Most large and medium-sized manufacturers and distributors are therefore important entities under their national transposition. Article 21 requires policies on the use of cryptography and, where appropriate, encryption, alongside supply chain security. A competent authority or a retailer's auditor can reasonably ask how that policy treats algorithms NIST will deprecate in 2030. Farms themselves are generally outside NIS2; the co-operatives, processors and distributors they sell to are not.

What does the EU Data Act change for farms and agri-tech suppliers?

Who may see the data a connected machine produces. Since 12 September 2025 the user of a connected product, the farmer in most cases, has the right to access the data it generates and to share it with third parties such as a repair business or an adviser. Connected products placed on the market after 12 September 2026 must give that access by design. The 2018 code of conduct from Copa-Cogeca, CEMA and partners already put the farmer at the heart of agricultural data; the Data Act makes it enforceable. For a machinery maker that means more data leaving your cloud over authenticated links, for more years, and every one of those links keys with RSA or ECDSA today.

Does FSMA 204 require encryption or post-quantum cryptography for traceability records?

No. The Food Traceability Rule requires key data elements for critical tracking events on foods on the Food Traceability List, available to the FDA within 24 hours of a request and as a sortable spreadsheet during an outbreak. The FDA says it will not enforce the rule before 20 July 2028, following a Congressional directive. What the rule does create is a record a regulator and your customers will rely on for years, exchanged between growers, packers, distributors and retailers over links and platforms that authenticate with quantum-vulnerable algorithms. Integrity is the question, not secrecy: if the signature on a lot record can be forged in 2032, the record proves nothing.

Ransomware is the threat we actually see. Why spend time on quantum?

Because the two share an entry point and a time horizon. The FBI's 2021 and 2022 notifications describe attackers reaching food businesses through managed service providers, unpatched systems and shared network resources, and the Food and Ag-ISAC counted 265 ransomware attacks on the sector in 2025. The same access that deploys ransomware can record traffic quietly, and recorded traffic protected by RSA or ECDSA becomes readable once a cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists. A recipe or a supplier contract recorded in 2026 is still valuable in 2036. The inventory and segmentation work that reduces ransomware risk is the first step of the migration, so you do both at once.

Can the PLCs on a packaging line, a temperature logger or a connected tractor run post-quantum cryptography?

Some can. Benchmarks from the pqm4 project put ML-KEM-768 key generation at roughly 100,000 clock cycles and about 1.5KB of stack on an ARM Cortex-M4, within reach of recent controllers and gateways and out of reach of older ones. Bandwidth bites harder than compute on a farm or in a cold store: an ML-KEM-768 exchange adds about 2,272 bytes, which matters on a low-rate radio or cellular link polled by hundreds of loggers. Classify each device family as algorithm-agile, firmware-updatable or algorithm-fixed, terminate post-quantum tunnels at a gateway for the fixed ones, and write agility into the next purchase.

Which protocols in a food plant, a cold chain and a farm are vulnerable to quantum attack?

Any protocol or tunnel that uses RSA or ECDSA for key exchange, certificates or authentication: OPC UA security modes between line controllers and historians, every IPsec or TLS VPN carrying vendor remote access or telematics, the TLS behind cold chain and traceability platforms, the AS2 certificates on your EDI, and the cloud links from a tractor's telematics gateway. Modbus/TCP, PROFINET and ISOBUS carry no cryptography of their own, which is a different problem, and the protection sits in the tunnels around them. The symmetric parts, AES and HMAC, hold up. Our free OT Protocol Quantum Vulnerability Scanner maps this for the protocols you select.

We are a co-operative or a mid-sized farm business, not a multinational. Where do we start?

With the links you do not control. A co-operative's exposure sits in the grain, feed and input platforms it shares with members, the EDI it runs with buyers and the telematics its members' machines report to, and the FBI's April 2022 notification shows co-operatives are attacked precisely because of their time-sensitive role at planting and harvest. Ask each platform provider and machinery maker for a post-quantum roadmap, list the certificates and VPNs you own, and put the rest in the contract. The free tools on this page cover the first two steps without a consultant.

Where should a food or agriculture business start?

With four pieces of evidence: a cryptographic inventory of plant OT, cold chain and traceability platforms, connected machinery and the enterprise systems behind them; a map of which recipes, contracts and records must stay confidential or provably intact beyond 2030 against the algorithms protecting them; device families classified by whether they can change algorithm; and roadmaps requested from every machinery maker, platform provider, logistics partner and EDI counterparty. Those four give the board the evidence to set priorities.

What does QSECDEF offer food and agriculture businesses for free?

Everything on this page. The two-minute readiness check scores your sites and supply chain against what NIS2 auditors, retailer audits, the FDA and your board can ask, and routes you to the right next step. The free tools, including the Third-Party Cryptographic Exposure Model and the OT Protocol Quantum Vulnerability Scanner, run in your browser with no registration. The weekly peer call runs every Tuesday at 15:00 CET and is open to anyone. Sample lectures from the 170-plus expert library are linked above, and the page is reviewed as the mandates change; the date beside the key facts is the last check.

Which QSECDEF course should a food and agriculture team take first?

It depends on the role. Boards, executives and co-operative councils start with the Certified Quantum Business Professional bootcamp, about 22 hours self-paced across ten modules. Security, quality and IT teams take Introduction to Quantum Cyber Security, four to five hours online with a QSECDEF certificate. OT and plant engineers take PQC Migration for Industrial Control Systems, the half-day sector course on controllers, protocols and Purdue-model sequencing. Whoever will run the migration takes CPQCPM, the Certified Post Quantum Cryptography Programme Manager course: ten hours live online over five weeks, with the next public cohort in January 2027.

Can QSECDEF run private training or a workshop for our food business, co-operative or agri-tech company?

Yes. QSECDEF runs private CPQCPM cohorts for a single organisation, live online or in person, and private deliveries of the sector courses listed under Equip your people for your plant, cold chain and supply chain teams, including the Quantum-Safe Supply Chain Security for Manufacturers workshop. Board and leadership workshops are built on your own exposure and obligations and end with an agreed position on quantum risk. Use the contact button in the For your organisation section and tell us your timeline.

How do we find vetted suppliers or consultants for a food and agriculture PQC migration?

Through the QSECDEF Expert Members directory. Every listed member has been vetted, has signed the Members' Charter and has presented to the community. You can filter by consulting and services, technology vendor or enablement and investment, and send a request for further information from the member's own page. QSECDEF is vendor-neutral and sells training, not migration products, so the shortlist stays yours.

Is QSECDEF membership relevant to a food manufacturer, a farm business or an agri-tech supplier?

Two routes. QSECDEF membership gives your team the self-paced courses, the full lecture archive, the weekly call and 25 per cent off CPQCPM and partner training. Expert Membership is for the builders, consultancies and technology vendors serving food and agriculture who want to be found by the people reading this page; it includes a showcase listing with an enquiry form, the Industry Conversations and speaking slots at the annual QSECDEF symposium.

Is QSECDEF selling a migration product?

No. QSECDEF is a vendor-neutral membership network. We train people and connect them with peers and peer-reviewed experts; we do not sell migration software or services.

How much time does the training take?

CPQCPM is ten hours of live instruction over five weeks, two hours a week. The Quantum Cyber Security course is 4 to 5 hours, self-paced. The business bootcamp is self-paced at your own speed. The industrial control systems and supply chain courses are listed with their formats on the training pages.

Ask a practitioner, live

The free weekly call runs every Tuesday at 15:00 CET. Bring your question.

Join the Tuesday call →
Four colleagues around a light wooden table, one standing and pointing at printed plans while the others look on.

For your organisation

Need it built around your sites, your cold chain or your growers?

When your board, your biggest retail customer or your co-operative's members need something specific, we shape the workshop, the training or the engagement around your plants, your fleet, your season and your supplier base. Independent of any vendor.

Custom workshops

Your leadership leaves with an agreed position on quantum risk and quantum opportunity

In-person sessions for food and agriculture businesses drawn from the manufacturing and logistics workshop programmes: PQC migration for industrial control systems, quantum-safe supply chain security, demand forecasting with quantum analytics, quantum in logistics and quantum optimisation for production scheduling.

Private training

Your plant, quality, procurement and logistics teams trained on one plan

Private CPQCPM cohorts, live online or in person for your required delegates, private deliveries of the ICS and supply chain courses, and team membership for the self-paced courses.

Consulting

A migration programme specified and staffed correctly

Cryptographic inventory, OT and cold chain assessment, PQC migration planning, supplier and platform review and specialist teams sourced from 1,500+ members across 900+ organisations.

Prefer email? Write to info@qsecdef.com and tell us about your timeline.

Photos: Pexels (Péter Borkó, Anna Shvets, Quang Vuong, Diego F. Parra, Pragyan Bezbaruah, ELEVATE) and QSECDEF, converted to black and white or brand duotone.