Stone columns of a government building at twilight

For departmental CISOs, CDOs, national cyber authorities, procurement and policy leads

Quantum risk in government and the public sector

Be ready when the centre, the auditor or the minister asks.

In fifteen minutes you will know which citizen records are already exposed, what the US, UK, EU, Canadian and Australian mandates now require of a department, and the first 90 days of a plan your permanent secretary or agency head can sign off.

  • Your exposure, record type by record type
  • The evidence the centre and auditors can ask for
  • A 90-day plan for your accounting officer or agency head
  • The right training for each role, including procurement
1,500+
professional members
900+
organisations represented
40+
countries
Vendor-neutral
based on evidence, not hype

Proud to recommend our expert members

Qrypto Cyber
Eclypses
Arqit
QuantBond
Krown
Applied Quantum
Quantum Bitcoin
Venari Security
QuStream
BHO Legal
Census
QSP
IONQ - ID Quantique
Patero
Entopya
Belden
Atlant3D
Zenith Studio
Qudef
Aries Partners
GQI
Upperside Conferences
Austrade
Arrise Innovations
CyberRST
Triarii Research
QSysteme
WizzWang
DeepTech DAO
Xyberteq
Viavi
Entrust
Qsentinel
Nokia
Gopher Security
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
Qrypto Cyber
Eclypses
Arqit
QuantBond
Krown
Applied Quantum
Quantum Bitcoin
Venari Security
QuStream
BHO Legal
Census
QSP
IONQ - ID Quantique
Patero
Entopya
Belden
Atlant3D
Zenith Studio
Qudef
Aries Partners
GQI
Upperside Conferences
Austrade
Arrise Innovations
CyberRST
Triarii Research
QSysteme
WizzWang
DeepTech DAO
Xyberteq
Viavi
Entrust
Qsentinel
Nokia
Gopher Security
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
A long aisle of compact shelving in a records archive.
Copied today. Read in 2046.

Step 1 of 5

Know which citizen records are already exposed

An adversary does not need a quantum computer today. Foreign intelligence services copy encrypted government traffic now and read it when one arrives. If a record created in 2026 must stay confidential past that point, it is exposed already, and public record law makes that a longer list in government than in any other sector.

Government records that must stay confidential beyond the post-quantum deadlines
Record typeTypical retention or closureConfidential until, if created in 2026
Classified records (US Executive Order 13526)Declassified at 25 years; exemptions to 50 or 75 years2051, up to 2101
UK public records selected for permanent preservationTransferred to The National Archives at 20 years; sensitive files closed longer2046 at the earliest
Census returns (England and Wales)Closed for 100 years2121 for the 2021 census
Children's social care records (England)Until the 75th anniversary of the child's birth2101 for a child born in 2026
Biometric identity data (passports, eID, borders)Useful to an attacker for the holder's lifetime; a fingerprint cannot be reissued2090s and beyond

Retention and closure periods from Executive Order 13526, the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010, The National Archives and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010. Check the schedules that apply to your department.

Where your exposure sits, and what you will know

A hand holding open a passport filled with stamps.

Identity and citizen services

Tax, benefits, passport and eID services run on digital signatures. Once a quantum computer exists, a forged credential is an immediate problem, not a future one.

You will know which PKI roots, signing services and identity systems need ML-DSA roadmaps before the 2031 signature deadlines.

Sunlight casting window shadows down an empty office corridor.

Inter-agency and cross-border exchange

Nothing moves until both ends move. Data shared between departments, with local authorities and with partner states migrates at the pace of the slowest gateway.

You will know which exchanges, partners and shared platforms set your timeline, and what to ask them.

Illuminated server racks in a government data centre.

Archives and long-lived records

Census, vetting, classified and case records carry the harvest now, decrypt later risk for decades.

You will know which archives and backups to protect first, even though they are the least visible systems.

Free readiness check

Score your department in two minutes

Eight questions mapped to what the centre of government, your auditor and your accounting officer can ask. You get a score, your top three priorities and the next step that closes your biggest gap. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Start the check
1Is there a named post-quantum migration lead who reports to the top of the department?

Executive Order 14412 gave US agencies 30 days to name one. Programmes without an owner stall at the inventory stage.

2Do you have a cryptographic inventory of your high value and high impact systems?

US agencies have owed OMB a prioritised inventory every year since May 2023. The NCSC expects discovery complete by 2028.

3Have you identified which records must stay sensitive beyond 2030?

OMB M-26-15 makes data that stays mission-sensitive in 2030 a priority criterion. Classified, census, vetting and care records all qualify.

4Do your identity, PKI and code-signing services have a route to post-quantum signatures by 2031?

US high value assets must use PQC signatures by 31 December 2031. Identity services are where forged credentials bite first.

5Do live tenders and framework call-offs require post-quantum support?

A system bought on a five-year contract today is live through the 2030 deadline. The US is writing a FAR rule to require FIPS-compliant PQC from contractors by 31 December 2030.

6Have your cloud and shared-service providers set out who migrates what?

OMB M-26-15 tells agencies to agree post-quantum responsibilities with their cloud providers under the shared responsibility model.

7Has your executive committee or audit and risk committee been briefed on quantum risk in the last 12 months?

M-26-15 says migration is not the CIO's and CISO's job alone. Accountability sits with the whole leadership team.

8Could you swap an algorithm in a citizen-facing system without re-engineering it?

Crypto-agility decides whether the 2030 and 2031 deadlines are achievable or notional.

Step 2 of 5

Know what the mandates require, and when

  1. 2024

    Standards final

    NIST publishes FIPS 203, 204 and 205 on 13 August.

  2. 2026

    Mandates land

    EO 14412 and OMB M-26-15 set US plans and deadlines. EU states owe national plans by year end. Canadian departments owed plans in April.

  3. 2028

    UK discovery done

    The NCSC expects discovery and assessment complete and an initial migration plan in place.

  4. 2030

    Most sensitive systems

    US high value assets use PQC for key establishment by 31 December. EU high-risk systems migrated. ASD says stop using RSA and ECC. NIST deprecates them.

  5. 2031

    Signatures and priorities

    US high value assets use PQC signatures by 31 December. NCSC and Canadian high-priority migrations complete.

  6. 2035

    Everything else

    NSM-10, the NCSC, the EU and Canada all end here. NIST disallows RSA and ECC.

Key facts for government, checked 30 October 2026

  • Executive Order 14412 (22 June 2026) requires federal high value assets and high impact systems to use PQC for key establishment by 31 December 2030 and for digital signatures by 31 December 2031. The White House
  • OMB M-26-15 (24 June 2026) required every civilian agency to submit a PQC migration plan within 120 days and to prioritise systems holding data that stays mission-sensitive in 2030. OMB
  • The Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act (Public Law 117-260, 21 December 2022) put the agency inventory and OMB guidance duties into statute. GovInfo
  • The NCSC asks UK organisations to complete discovery and an initial plan by 2028, highest-priority migration by 2031 and full migration by 2035. UK NCSC
  • The EU roadmap of 23 June 2025 asks Member States for national plans by the end of 2026, high-risk systems migrated by 2030 and as many systems as feasible by 2035. European Commission
  • NIST IR 8547, final in October 2026, deprecates quantum-vulnerable public-key cryptography after 2030 and disallows it after 2035, without relaxing the earlier federal deadlines. NIST
  • Canada's roadmap ITSM.40.001 required departmental migration plans by April 2026, high-priority systems by the end of 2031 and the rest by the end of 2035. Canadian Centre for Cyber Security
  • The Australian Signals Directorate recommends ceasing use of RSA, DH, ECDH and ECDSA by the end of 2030. ASD
A curved colonnade of a neoclassical government building.

The evidence you will be able to show the centre, your auditor and your minister

EO 14412 and M-26-15

A named lead and a submitted plan

You show: A migration lead known to the centre and a phased plan aligned to NIST IR 8547.

NCSC 2028 milestone

Discovery complete

You show: A cryptographic inventory, ideally a CBOM, with supplier dependencies and long-lived roots of trust listed.

NIS2 Article 21(2)(h)

A cryptography policy that names the threat

You show: A policy that addresses quantum cryptanalysis and names the NIST standards, with review dates.

CISA product categories

Procurement that asks for PQC

You show: Tender clauses requiring FIPS 203, 204 and 205 support in the categories where products are already available.

Sunlight casting window shadows down an empty office corridor.

UK departments. GovAssure assesses departments against the NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework, and the NCSC's 2028, 2031 and 2035 milestones set the pace. Neither the Government Cyber Security Strategy 2022 to 2030 nor the Government Cyber Action Plan that replaced it in January 2026 names post-quantum cryptography, so the evidence an assessor expects comes from the NCSC guidance, not from the strategy. Read the public sector analysis.

EU public administrations: NIS2

Annex I of NIS2 lists public administration entities of central government as essential entities, and Article 21(2)(h) requires policies on the use of cryptography and encryption. Member States had to transpose it by 17 October 2024, and the EU roadmap now asks each of them for a national PQC plan by the end of 2026. Read the NIS2 analysis.

National strategy and sovereign capability

A migration plan is only as sovereign as the cloud, HSMs and identity providers it depends on. Our government workshops on national strategy and sovereign capability cover the strategic layer, and our sovereign compute consulting covers where the data sits.

Legislators and regulators

Export controls, procurement law and sector regulation are being rewritten while the standards settle. The regulatory landscape workshop is built for the people drafting the instruments, and the government and policy workshop programme lists all six.

QKD for government networks

Quantum key distribution protects a point-to-point link and nothing else: not stored data, not signatures, not the citizen's browser. Governments that have deployed QKD links still need PQC. See the government QKD deployments and where QKD makes sense.

What national bodies have already published

Public post-quantum work by governments and their cyber authorities, so you can reuse their language and benchmark your department.

June 2026

The White House

Executive Order 14413 ordered an updated National Quantum Strategy within 180 days and an analysis of quantum supply chains to strengthen domestic capability.

Source: The White House →
January 2026

CISA

Listed the product categories where PQC products are widely available, including cloud IaaS and PaaS, browsers and web servers, and full disk encryption, for agencies to require in acquisitions.

Source: CISA →
September 2025

Australian Signals Directorate

Updated its planning guidance, recommending that organisations stop using traditional asymmetric cryptography by the end of 2030 and setting out its LATICE transition phases.

Source: ASD →
June 2025

Canadian Centre for Cyber Security

Issued ITSM.40.001, a roadmap requiring Government of Canada departments to plan by April 2026 and report progress annually.

Source: Cyber Centre →
March 2025

UK NCSC

Published its three-phase migration timeline to 2035, noting that larger organisations will need significant planning and investment while most small firms will migrate through routine upgrades.

Source: UK NCSC →
September 2024

CISA

Published a strategy for moving federal agencies to automated cryptographic discovery and inventory tools, as directed by NSM-10.

Source: CISA →

Step 3 of 5

Build a plan your accounting officer can sign off in 90 days

By day 30

It has an owner and a scope

  • A migration lead named, with a sponsor on the executive committee.
  • Inventory scoped to high value and high impact systems and critical citizen services.
  • Record types mapped to retention and closure periods.
By day 60

You have the evidence

  • Automated discovery running and the cryptographic inventory started.
  • A post-quantum questionnaire with every cloud, shared-service and PKI provider.
  • FIPS 203, 204 and 205 clauses drafted for live tenders and call-offs.
By day 90

Your leadership has a plan to approve

  • Systems ranked by data lifetime, classification and exposure.
  • Hybrid key exchange piloted on one citizen-facing service.
  • A phased plan with 2028, 2030, 2031 and 2035 milestones, in the shape the centre asks for.
Who will deliver it? See step 4 →

The five numbers to show your executive committee

  1. Inventory coverageThe share of high value and high impact systems with a completed cryptographic inventory.
  2. Exposed recordsThe record types, and volumes, that must stay sensitive beyond 2030.
  3. Procurement coverageHow many live tenders and call-offs carry post-quantum requirements.
  4. Provider readinessHow many cloud, shared-service and PKI providers have a post-quantum roadmap and agreed responsibilities on file.
  5. Plan statusBudget committed and milestones met against 2028, 2030, 2031 and 2035.

How to phase the spend, 2026 to 2035

  1. 2026 to 2027Discover and planLead, governance, inventory, data-lifetime map and provider questionnaire: M-26-15 phase one, the EU national plan and the NCSC discovery phase.
  2. 2027 to 2028Pilots and early migrationHybrid pilots on citizen-facing services, PQC clauses in tenders, early migration of prioritised systems, discovery complete by 2028.
  3. 2028 to 2031Prioritised migrationKey establishment on high value assets by the end of 2030, digital signatures and identity by the end of 2031.
  4. 2031 to 2035Complete the estateRemaining systems migrated, legacy systems replaced or decommissioned, before RSA and ECC are disallowed in 2035.

Phases follow OMB M-26-15 and the NCSC timelines. For budget ranges, see our PQC migration cost benchmarks.

Free tools to do it this quarter

Need help delivering the plan? Our expert members are peer-reviewed suppliers, integrators and advisers. Meet the expert members →

Step 4 of 5

Equip the people who will deliver it

A migration succeeds or stalls on people. Match each role to the outcome you need from them, including the people who write the tenders.

For your migration lead

Your migration lead can run the programme to the 2030 and 2031 deadlines

  • Inventory and CBOM auditing for high value and high impact systems
  • Risk prioritisation by data lifetime, classification and exposure
  • Crypto-agile architecture and GRC integration for assurance evidence
  • Supplier management and a tabletop exercise with your scenario

CPQCPM, Certified Post Quantum Cryptography Programme Manager. Ten hours live online over five weeks, small cohorts, delivered by Chris Basener of Argus Advisory and certified by QSECDEF. See the full course →

$1,450 a seat · $1,087.50 for members

QSECDEF training · CPQCPM

Watch the overview, then get the brochure, dates and costs

Your brochure, the next cohort dates and the costs are ready on the next page.

We use your email to send QSECDEF updates and news. See our privacy policy.

Permanent secretaries, agency heads and board members

Your leadership can challenge the plan, approve the budget and answer the minister.

Certified Quantum Business Professional

Self-paced, no physics background. Covers PQC, policy and PQC risk and migration management.

Free first session · included in membership

Get Session 1 free
Security, risk and IT teams

Your teams understand the threat, the standards and the tools before they start.

Introduction to Quantum Cyber Security

Six modules, 4 to 5 hours, certificated.

Free first module · included in membership

Get Module 1 free
Standards, compliance and procurement leads

Your compliance and procurement teams can write FIPS 203, 204 and 205 into policy and tenders with confidence.

Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards Compliance for Government

Full day, 6 hours, in person or online, certificate on completion. Covers NIST FIPS 203, 204 and 205, NCSC guidance and ETSI quantum-safe standards for government systems.

In person or online · enquire for dates and pricing

Enquire about this workshop
Rows of empty desks and microphones in a legislative chamber.

Training the whole department? Put everyone on one plan.

Team membership brings your leadership, migration lead, security and procurement teams up to speed together, tracks what each person has completed and certifies across the group. The business bootcamp and the Quantum Cyber Security course are included, plus 170+ expert lectures and the weekly call, and members pay less for CPQCPM.

See team membership

Step 5 of 5

Compare notes with peers in departments a year ahead of you

A members-only structured Q&A for departmental CISOs and CDOs, national cyber authority staff, procurement and policy leads and the officials who advise them. It runs under the Chatham House Rule and is facilitated by Anna Beata Kalisz Hedegaard, Founder of QSECDEF.

  • A sequencing framework for identity, inter-agency exchange and archives
  • A read on how peers are phasing budgets against 2028, 2030 and 2031
  • What assurance reviewers and auditors are asking about cryptography
  • Direct relationships with officials solving the same problem in other jurisdictions
A QSECDEF symposium panel on stage in front of an audience
Practitioner panels, on the record
QSECDEF members and speakers together outside the Arc de Triomphe in Paris
Peers you can call afterwards
Panellists in discussion at a QSECDEF symposium
Questions taken from the floor
A speaker presenting slides at the QSECDEF World Symposium
Briefings on what is changing
A keynote speaker at the QSECDEF World Symposium lectern
QSECDEF World Symposium, Paris

Lectures from people doing this work

Practitioner lectures from the QSECDEF library that matter most to government: standardisation, export controls, legal frameworks, a country-wide QKD network and the mechanics of a PQC programme.

Browse all expert lectures

Expert contributors represent leading organisations worldwide

Airbus Central R&T
Aireon
Airesatech
Ait
Appliedquantum
Arise Innovations
Arobs
Arqit
Asc Csa
Atlant3D
Bank of Ireland
Barak Azar
Basener Consulting
BHO Legal
Bitcoinqs
Bloq
Buckingham
CloudTech Group
Coherent Computing
Creotech
Cryptalabs
CyberProtonics
Cysec
Cystel
Deimos Space
Department of Digitalization
Dhbw
Dlr
Eclypses
Elpromaelectronics
Engineering
Enluzstrategy
Entrokey Labs
Eptalent
ESA
Esa
Euc
EXATEL
Finqbit
Fraunhofer
Georgetown
GQI
Helix Ft
Ibm
Idquantique
Jagiellonian University
Jos Quantum
Kets Quantum
Kit
Krown Technologies
Kwantumg
Lightriderinc
Linkedin
Lnu
Mbda Systems
Meetiqm
Merqury
Metrosert
Molket
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun
Nokia
Orcacomputing
Osi
Pantherun
Patero
Photonics Foundry
Q Ctrl
Qryptocyber
Qssys
Qticompany
Qtlabs
Quandela
Quant X Sec
Quant.Bond
Quantivate
Quantum Computing Inc
Quantum Dice
Quantumbrilliance
Quantumprime
Quantzen
Qubridge
Qudef
Quranium
Qustream
Reddixgroup
Slater Technologies
Smartcyber Group
Smoad
Sparkle
Swiss Financial Innovation Desk
Technology Innovation Institute (TII)
Thequantuminsider
Tobias Heindel
Tu Braunschweig
University College London
University of Bremen
University of Pisa
Venari Security
Veriqloud
Viavisolutions
Vodafone
Welinq
Wizzwang
Xairos
Youtube
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
HYPATIA Smart Technologies
SAS
Triarii Research
Airbus Central R&T
Aireon
Airesatech
Ait
Appliedquantum
Arise Innovations
Arobs
Arqit
Asc Csa
Atlant3D
Bank of Ireland
Barak Azar
Basener Consulting
BHO Legal
Bitcoinqs
Bloq
Buckingham
CloudTech Group
Coherent Computing
Creotech
Cryptalabs
CyberProtonics
Cysec
Cystel
Deimos Space
Department of Digitalization
Dhbw
Dlr
Eclypses
Elpromaelectronics
Engineering
Enluzstrategy
Entrokey Labs
Eptalent
ESA
Esa
Euc
EXATEL
Finqbit
Fraunhofer
Georgetown
GQI
Helix Ft
Ibm
Idquantique
Jagiellonian University
Jos Quantum
Kets Quantum
Kit
Krown Technologies
Kwantumg
Lightriderinc
Linkedin
Lnu
Mbda Systems
Meetiqm
Merqury
Metrosert
Molket
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun
Nokia
Orcacomputing
Osi
Pantherun
Patero
Photonics Foundry
Q Ctrl
Qryptocyber
Qssys
Qticompany
Qtlabs
Quandela
Quant X Sec
Quant.Bond
Quantivate
Quantum Computing Inc
Quantum Dice
Quantumbrilliance
Quantumprime
Quantzen
Qubridge
Qudef
Quranium
Qustream
Reddixgroup
Slater Technologies
Smartcyber Group
Smoad
Sparkle
Swiss Financial Innovation Desk
Technology Innovation Institute (TII)
Thequantuminsider
Tobias Heindel
Tu Braunschweig
University College London
University of Bremen
University of Pisa
Venari Security
Veriqloud
Viavisolutions
Vodafone
Welinq
Wizzwang
Xairos
Youtube
Quside
QIZ
Global Quantum Intelligence
HYPATIA Smart Technologies
SAS
Triarii Research

Expert Membership

Builders, consultancies and technology vendors serving government and the public sector: talk to us

Expert membership brings you into an open community working across sectors, opening up industry conversations, knowledge and access to experts. If you are building technology or consulting capabilities in this sector relevant to Quantum or Advanced AI, we want to hear from you.

  • Access to all Industry Conversations
  • Speaker opportunities at the annual Paris Symposium
  • Enhanced expert profile with lecture archive
  • Co-branding opportunities and social amplification
  • 25% off partner training and events

Everything you need, in one place

Our analysis for government and the public sector

Policy and mandates

Questions leaders ask

What do governments now require for post-quantum cryptography?

In the US, Executive Order 14412 and OMB M-26-15 require civilian agencies to migrate high value assets and high impact systems to PQC for key establishment by 31 December 2030 and for digital signatures by 31 December 2031, with full migration by 2035 under NSM-10. The UK NCSC sets milestones at 2028, 2031 and 2035. The EU roadmap asks Member States for national plans by the end of 2026, high-risk systems by 2030 and as many systems as feasible by 2035. Canada's ITSM.40.001 mirrors the 2031 and 2035 dates, and Australia's ASD recommends ceasing traditional asymmetric cryptography by the end of 2030.

What does OMB M-26-15 require of US federal agencies?

M-26-15, issued on 24 June 2026, implements Executive Order 14412. Each civilian agency had to submit a PQC migration plan to OMB and the Office of the National Cyber Director within 120 days, integrate PQC into existing governance rather than leaving it to the CIO and CISO alone, prioritise high value assets, high impact systems and any system holding data that stays mission-sensitive in 2030, agree responsibilities with cloud providers, and align the plan to NIST IR 8547. Systems that cannot support PQC or hybrid cryptography must be identified for replacement or decommissioning.

What are the NCSC post-quantum migration timelines for UK government?

The NCSC guidance of 20 March 2025 sets three milestones. By 2028, complete discovery and assessment and have an initial migration plan that identifies priorities, supplier dependencies and investment. By 2031, complete the highest-priority migration activities and refine the plan. By 2035, complete the migration. The dates are guidance rather than law, but GovAssure assessments against the Cyber Assessment Framework are where a department will be asked about them.

Does NIS2 apply to public administration?

Yes. Annex I of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 lists public administration entities of central government as a high-criticality sector, and Member States may bring regional entities into scope. Article 21(2)(h) requires policies and procedures on the use of cryptography and, where appropriate, encryption. The Directive had to be transposed by 17 October 2024, so the national law in each Member State is the text to read.

Why does harvest now, decrypt later matter more for government?

An adversary copies encrypted traffic or data today and stores it until a quantum computer can break the encryption. Governments hold the records with the longest confidentiality: classified material declassified at 25 years or later, census returns closed for 100 years, care records kept to a 75th birthday, and biometric identity data that cannot be reissued. State intelligence services also have the patience and the budget to store ciphertext for decades.

Where should a department start?

Name a migration lead with authority across IT, security and procurement. Build a cryptographic inventory of high value and high impact systems and the services citizens depend on. Map record types to retention and closure periods to find what must stay sensitive past 2030. Then get post-quantum roadmaps from your cloud, shared-service, PKI and identity providers. Those four steps give an accounting officer the evidence to set priorities.

Is quantum key distribution an option for government networks?

QKD can protect a fixed point-to-point link between two trusted sites, which is why some governments have deployed it for inter-ministry or national backbone links. It does nothing for stored data, digital signatures, identity or the citizen's connection to a service, and it needs its own authentication, which today means PQC. Treat it as a possible addition for a small number of high-value links, not as a substitute for migrating the estate.

Do we need sovereign compute to migrate to post-quantum cryptography?

Not for the migration itself, but the migration exposes the question. Post-quantum key establishment and signatures on a hyperscale cloud are only as sovereign as the key management, HSMs and identity services behind them, and OMB M-26-15 tells agencies to agree who migrates what with their cloud providers. A department that cannot answer where its keys are generated and held has a sovereignty gap as well as a cryptography gap.

Which quantum security standards apply to government systems?

NIST FIPS 203 (ML-KEM) for key establishment and FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA) for signatures, published on 13 August 2024, are the reference in the US, the UK, Canada, Australia and the EU roadmap. NIST IR 8547 sets the deprecation schedule. In the US, national security systems follow CNSA 2.0 instead, and in Europe ETSI quantum-safe specifications sit alongside the NIST standards. Government procurement should name the FIPS numbers, not the algorithm nicknames.

Who provides quantum risk assessments for critical infrastructure?

Sector regulators and national cyber authorities set the frame: in the US, Sector Risk Management Agencies under Executive Order 14412 help operators build PQC migration plans and CISA publishes the guidance; in the UK, competent authorities use the NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework. The assessment itself is usually done by the operator's own team or an independent adviser with no product to sell. QSECDEF runs a full-day Critical National Infrastructure Quantum Risk workshop and a members' network of practitioners who have done the work.

How does post-quantum migration relate to a national quantum strategy?

A national quantum strategy sets research, industrial and sovereign capability goals. PQC migration is the defensive programme that sits underneath it: it is the part with deadlines, auditors and budgets this year. The EU roadmap now asks every Member State for a national PQC plan by the end of 2026, and Executive Order 14413 ordered an updated US National Quantum Strategy alongside the migration order. The two belong in the same ministerial briefing.

What does QSECDEF offer government departments and agencies for free?

Everything on this page. The two-minute readiness check scores your government and the public sector programme and routes you to the right next step. The free tools, including the HNDL Risk Calculator and the Q-Day Timeline Risk Calculator, run in your browser with no registration. The weekly peer call runs every Tuesday at 15:00 CET and is open to anyone. Sample lectures from the 170-plus expert library are linked above, and the page is reviewed as the mandates change; the date beside the key facts is the last check.

Which QSECDEF course should a government and the public sector team take first?

It depends on the role. Permanent secretaries, agency heads and board members start with the Certified Quantum Business Professional bootcamp, about 22 hours self-paced across ten modules. Security, risk and IT teams take Introduction to Quantum Cyber Security, four to five hours online with a QSECDEF certificate. Standards, compliance and procurement leads take Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards Compliance for Government, for standards, compliance and procurement leads. Whoever will run the migration takes CPQCPM, the Certified Post Quantum Cryptography Programme Manager course: ten hours live online over five weeks, with the next public cohort in January 2027.

Can QSECDEF run private training or a workshop for our department, agency or authority?

Yes. QSECDEF runs private CPQCPM cohorts for a single organisation, live online or in person, and private deliveries of the sector courses listed under Equip your people for your standards, compliance and procurement leads. Board and leadership workshops are built on your own exposure and obligations and end with an agreed position on quantum risk. Use the contact button in the For your organisation section and tell us your timeline.

How do we find vetted suppliers or consultants for a government and the public sector PQC migration?

Through the QSECDEF Expert Members directory. Every listed member has been vetted, has signed the Members' Charter and has presented to the community. You can filter by consulting and services, technology vendor or enablement and investment, and send a request for further information from the member's own page. QSECDEF is vendor-neutral and sells training, not migration products, so the shortlist stays yours.

Is QSECDEF membership relevant to a department, agency or authority?

Two routes. QSECDEF membership gives your team the self-paced courses, the full lecture archive, the weekly call and 25 per cent off CPQCPM and partner training. Expert Membership is for the builders, consultancies and technology vendors serving government and the public sector who want to be found by the people reading this page; it includes a showcase listing with an enquiry form, the Industry Conversations and speaking slots at the annual QSECDEF symposium.

Is QSECDEF selling a migration product?

No. QSECDEF is a vendor-neutral membership network. We train people and connect them with peers and peer-reviewed experts; we do not sell migration software or services and we are independent of any country's suppliers.

How much time does the training take?

CPQCPM is ten hours of live instruction over five weeks, two hours a week. The Quantum Cyber Security course is 4 to 5 hours, self-paced. The standards compliance workshop for government is a full day of six hours, in person or online. The business bootcamp is self-paced at your own speed.

Ask a practitioner, live

The free weekly call runs every Tuesday at 15:00 CET. Bring your question.

Join the Tuesday call →
Colleagues reviewing documents together around a meeting table.

For your department

Need it built around your department or agency?

When your executive committee, programme team or national authority needs something specific, we shape the workshop, the training or the engagement around your systems, your classification regime and your timeline. Independent of any vendor and of any country's suppliers.

Custom workshops

Your leadership leaves with an agreed position on quantum risk

Facilitated sessions for executive committees, audit and risk committees and national authorities, built on your own exposure, mandates and 2030 plan.

Private training

Your whole department trained on one plan

Private CPQCPM cohorts, live online or in person for your required delegates, with the standards compliance workshop for procurement and policy teams.

Consulting

A migration programme specified and staffed correctly

Cryptographic inventory, PQC migration planning, sovereign compute review and specialist teams sourced from 1,500+ members across 900+ organisations.

Prefer email? Write to info@qsecdef.com and tell us about your timeline.

Photos: Pexels (may day.ua, Héctor Berganza, panumas nikhomkhai, Eric Lozaga, Ekaterina Belinskaya, Jacky. T. R. Chou, Efrem Efre, Sora Shimazaki) and QSECDEF, converted to black and white or brand duotone.