| 1 | Telecoms Cryptographic Architecture Baseline Where cryptography lives across RAN, core, transport, and service layers | |
| 2 | Cryptographic Discovery Methodology for Multi-Vendor Networks Building a Cryptographic Bill of Materials across heterogeneous telecoms infrastructure | - RAN layer discovery: identifying cryptographic implementations in baseband units, fronthaul (eCPRI), and midhaul interfaces across Ericsson, Nokia, Samsung, and Open RAN vendors
- Core network cryptography: GTP-U/GTP-C tunnel encryption, 5G-AKA authentication, SUPI/SUCI privacy mechanisms, and SBA (Service Based Architecture) TLS dependencies
- Transport and backhaul: IPsec and MACsec implementations across MPLS/Segment Routing networks, peering points, and submarine cable landing stations
|
| Break |
| 3 | Quantum Vulnerability Classification and Risk Scoring Mapping algorithm exposure to quantum threat timelines | - Algorithm vulnerability taxonomy: classifying RSA, ECDH, ECDSA, AES, SHA across telecoms protocol stacks by quantum vulnerability category (broken, weakened, safe)
- Data sensitivity and harvest-now-decrypt-later: assessing which telecoms data flows carry information with secrecy lifetimes exceeding the quantum threat horizon
- Composite risk scoring: combining algorithm vulnerability, data sensitivity, exposure window, and remediation complexity into a prioritised migration matrix
|
| 4 | Interactive Demonstration: Building a Telecoms CBOM Full-day format only | - Working through a reference mobile network architecture to populate a Cryptographic Bill of Materials (CBOM) across RAN, core, transport, and OSS/BSS layers
- Applying the ETSI GR QSC 006 and NCSC quantum risk assessment frameworks to score each cryptographic dependency by migration urgency
- Generating a migration priority matrix that accounts for vendor dependency, standards timeline (3GPP Release 19/20), and operational risk
|
| Break |
| 5 | Migration Planning and Vendor Readiness Turning the inventory into an actionable migration roadmap | - Phased migration sequencing: prioritising SIM/USIM key agreement, then core network SBA interfaces, then RAN backhaul, based on exposure and feasibility
- Vendor readiness assessment: evaluating Ericsson, Nokia, Huawei, Mavenir, and Cisco PQC roadmaps against your specific network topology
- Regulatory alignment: mapping migration phases to NIS2 Directive timelines, national telecoms security requirements (UK TSA, German TKG, French ARCEP), and GSMA PQC guidance
|
| 6 | Operational Continuity and Testing Strategy Migrating without degrading network performance or availability | - Hybrid classical/PQC deployment: running ML-KEM alongside ECDH during transition to maintain backward compatibility with legacy equipment
- Performance testing methodology: measuring PQC handshake latency impact on 5G-AKA, GTP tunnel setup, and TLS session establishment at production traffic volumes
- Rollback planning: designing crypto-agile architectures that allow algorithm replacement without service interruption
|
| 7 | Q&A and Organisation-Specific Planning | |