Workshop Description
Quantum technology vendors targeting intelligence and government customers often present capabilities in terms that obscure actual performance. Qubit counts are quoted without error rates. Quantum advantage is claimed without peer-reviewed evidence. Sensing sensitivity is specified under laboratory conditions that bear no resemblance to operational environments. For intelligence procurement, these gaps between claimed and actual capability can have operational consequences.
This workshop equips intelligence procurement teams with specific technical evaluation techniques. Participants learn to assess quantum computing performance using metrics that matter (gate fidelity, coherence time, circuit volume) rather than headline numbers. For quantum sensing, the session covers how to evaluate sensitivity claims against operational noise environments. The session includes a TRL-based assessment framework with quantum-specific benchmarks at each level, calibrated for intelligence community procurement requirements.
What participants cover
- Quantum computing performance metrics: gate fidelity, coherence time, circuit volume versus marketing claims
- Quantum sensing evaluation: laboratory versus operational performance gaps for intelligence applications
- TRL framework with quantum-specific benchmarks for intelligence community procurement
- Red flag identification: common overclaims and misleading metrics in quantum vendor proposals
- Due diligence methodology: technical, team, IP, and supply chain assessment for quantum acquisitions
- Vendor comparison framework calibrated for intelligence community requirements and security constraints