Workshop Description
Quantum technology marketing frequently overstates capability. Vendors claim quantum advantage without peer-reviewed evidence, quote qubit counts without specifying error rates, and project timelines based on engineering optimism rather than demonstrated progress. For defence procurement, the consequences of purchasing overstated quantum technology range from wasted budget to dependence on systems that fail to deliver promised capability.
This workshop equips procurement teams with specific evaluation techniques. Participants learn to interrogate quantum computing performance claims using metrics that matter (gate fidelity, coherence time, circuit volume) rather than headline qubit counts. For quantum sensing, the session covers how to evaluate sensitivity claims against environmental noise, SWaP specifications, and field-versus-laboratory performance gaps. The session includes a structured vendor assessment framework calibrated to defence Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1-9) with specific quantum technology benchmarks at each level.
What participants cover
- Quantum computing performance metrics: gate fidelity, coherence time, circuit volume, and quantum volume limitations
- Quantum sensing evaluation: sensitivity specifications versus operational environment performance
- TRL framework for quantum technologies: specific benchmarks and evidence requirements at each level
- Red flag identification: common overclaims in quantum vendor presentations and proposals
- Due diligence methodology: technical, financial, and supply chain assessment for quantum acquisitions
- Structured vendor comparison framework for defence quantum technology procurement