Workshop Description
Military tactical communications span multiple layers: HF and VHF radio nets, UHF SATCOM, L-band tactical data links (Link 16, Link 22), and IP-based mesh networks. Each layer has different bandwidth, latency, and power constraints. ML-KEM key encapsulation produces ciphertexts of 768-1568 bytes depending on parameter set. ML-DSA signatures range from 2420 to 4627 bytes. For Link 16 with its 1.136 Mbps throughput and fixed message formats, integrating PQC requires careful protocol redesign rather than drop-in replacement.
This workshop works through the PQC migration challenges for each tactical communication layer. Participants examine ML-KEM and ML-DSA performance on constrained processors (ARM Cortex-M4/M33 class), bandwidth overhead analysis for narrow-band channels, key management for disconnected and intermittent operations, and hybrid deployment strategies that maintain interoperability with legacy allied systems. The interactive demonstration models PQC overhead impact on a representative tactical network, showing where PQC fits comfortably and where it requires protocol-level adaptation.
What participants cover
- ML-KEM and ML-DSA performance on constrained processors: ARM Cortex-M4, FPGA, and ASIC benchmarks
- Bandwidth overhead analysis: PQC ciphertext and signature sizes versus tactical channel capacities
- Link 16 and Link 22 PQC integration: message format constraints and protocol-level adaptation requirements
- Satellite uplink protection: PQC for MILSATCOM, commercial SATCOM, and future protected waveforms
- Key management for disconnected operations: pre-positioned keys, ephemeral key exchange, and resynchronisation
- Hybrid deployment: maintaining interoperability with legacy allied tactical systems during migration